<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: einrealist</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=einrealist</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 13:20:55 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=einrealist" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by einrealist in "Norway should buy OpenAI"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Or 2x less. 800B valued is not 800B invested. And it wouldn't be the first time investors sell at a loss if sentiment declines.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 19:58:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49351758</link><dc:creator>einrealist</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49351758</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49351758</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by einrealist in "The Amazon tax"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is so true!<p>I rarely order anything from Amazon these days, maybe once or twice a year. Everything feels like a rip-off or fake. I don't trust the search function at all. Nor do I trust the customer ratings. The only exception is if I buy from a brand I already know that has its own brand-shop, owned directly by the manufacturer.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 14:57:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49346584</link><dc:creator>einrealist</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49346584</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49346584</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by einrealist in "UEFA and its national associations will not participate in FIFA competitions"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes, but isn't football already overly commercialised? Why is advertising for sports betting or alcohol any better than the FIFA issue? UEFA should take a look at itself, too.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 19:36:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49114662</link><dc:creator>einrealist</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49114662</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49114662</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by einrealist in "DSpark: Speculative decoding accelerates LLM inference [pdf]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yet another band aid.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2026 17:50:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48700233</link><dc:creator>einrealist</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48700233</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48700233</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by einrealist in "There is a shadow hanging over this Fable thing"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Nice summary. Reading this reminds me about the strong encryption discussion.<p>> We optimize what we can measure, not what we actually want to achieve. We hope and pray that these are the same thing, but they often aren’t.<p>He points out the core problem with LLMs. I believe it is impossible (or extremely expensive) to ensure that the models are aligned safely for everyone and any intention. And 'safe' can mean different things for a different audience.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 06:57:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48514223</link><dc:creator>einrealist</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48514223</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48514223</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by einrealist in "Why is Vivado 2026.1 dropping Linux support for free tier?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Maintaining support for Windows is free?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2026 08:19:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48255536</link><dc:creator>einrealist</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48255536</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48255536</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by einrealist in "SpaceX S-1"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>"We do not anticipate declaring or paying any cash dividends to holders of our common stock in the foreseeable future."<p>Sounds like 'never' to me.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 21:44:00 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48214587</link><dc:creator>einrealist</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48214587</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48214587</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by einrealist in "OpenAI Is Preparing to File for an IPO Soon"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Must be retail investors believing: big number == good.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 17:55:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48211507</link><dc:creator>einrealist</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48211507</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48211507</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by einrealist in "Google changes its search box"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>So good SEO will require prompt injection now?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 18:57:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48197713</link><dc:creator>einrealist</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48197713</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48197713</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by einrealist in "Who will buy your services if you fire us all?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I strongly doubt it will even provide us with a roof over our heads. In an unconstrained market, the pressure to extract as much as possible from the UBI will be enormous. The amount of UBI will probably always lag years behind the actual amount required to create a liveable situation, and increasing its amount will be a constant political struggle.<p>UBI in an unconstrained market is nothing else than enslavement.<p>Fair and progressive taxation and proper social systems are far more efficient. UBI is just an excuse to get rid of social systems and leave everyone individually stranded with problems no one can solve alone.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 22:33:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48186722</link><dc:creator>einrealist</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48186722</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48186722</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by einrealist in "Every AI Subscription Is a Ticking Time Bomb for Enterprise"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Those price increases will increase the pressure to use cheaper / free models (commoditization), thus cutting into the revenue projections of the frontier model vendors. Its going to be exciting to see what happens to these huge investments and valuations.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 13:07:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48168601</link><dc:creator>einrealist</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48168601</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48168601</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by einrealist in "Teaching Claude Why"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Isn't alignment a dilemma?<p>Because what is aligned, how and for whom? And who decides how that alignment should look like? There are probably many domains in which required alignment is in conflict with each other (e.g. using LLMs for warfare vs. ethically based domains). I can't imagine how this can be viable on the required scale (like one model per domain) for the already huge investments.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 10:26:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48073763</link><dc:creator>einrealist</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48073763</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48073763</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by einrealist in "A recent experience with ChatGPT 5.5 Pro"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Compute in science was already subsidized by public funding or by donations. Most supercomputers are financed this way. And that's a good thing. If you have a good science problem that can be computed, apply for compute time. There is nothing wrong to apply that to LLMs as well, like I wrote in my initial post. The human is still required to identity problems that are worth to be computed, to create prompts that the LLM can act on, and to verify results. But, OpenAI providing compute for basically free is still tied to a different incentive: to fuel the hype and to capture the market, while distorting/obfuscating the real costs. That's also the reason for why we cannot claim that 'economics on LLMs is just unbeatable'. It depends on the problem, the reason for a prompt.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 08:17:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48073054</link><dc:creator>einrealist</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48073054</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48073054</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by einrealist in "A recent experience with ChatGPT 5.5 Pro"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Did I praise our animal agriculture anywhere?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 07:31:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48072760</link><dc:creator>einrealist</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48072760</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48072760</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by einrealist in "A recent experience with ChatGPT 5.5 Pro"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>"After 16 minutes and 41 seconds, it came back" ... "further 47 minutes and 39 seconds" ... "After 13 minutes and 33 seconds" ... "After 9 minutes and 12 seconds" ... "After 31 minutes and 40 seconds" ... plus other computations<p>Anyone spotting the issue here? What did that really cost?<p>I am not against compute being used for scientific or other important problems. We did that before LLMs. However, the major LLM gatekeepers want to make all industries and companies dependent on their models. And, at some point, they need to charge them the actual, unsubsidized costs for the compute. In the meantime, companies restructure in the hopes that the compute costs remain cheap.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 07:16:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48072665</link><dc:creator>einrealist</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48072665</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48072665</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by einrealist in "Microsoft and OpenAI end their exclusive and revenue-sharing deal"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I wonder how this figure was settled. Is it based on consumer pricing? Can't Microsoft and OpenAI just make a number up, aside from a minimum to cover operating costs? When is the number just a marketing ploy to make it seem huge, important and inevitable (and too big to fail)?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 14:12:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47921894</link><dc:creator>einrealist</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47921894</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47921894</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by einrealist in "An AI agent deleted our production database. The agent's confession is below"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Also funny how people (including LLM vendors, like Cursor) think that rules in a system prompt (or custom rules) are real safety measures.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 17:24:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47912029</link><dc:creator>einrealist</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47912029</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47912029</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by einrealist in "An update on recent Claude Code quality reports"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Is 'refactoring Markdown files' already a thing?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 18:25:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47879475</link><dc:creator>einrealist</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47879475</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47879475</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by einrealist in "Claude Design"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>True. I didn't expect it to provide novel designs. Maybe Anthropic should find a better replacement for 'Design'.<p>In my example, I expected it to create UI elements for a business application / expert system. And it did fine. In fact, I believe its perfect for creating average and functional designs. Its a better way to test variations of UIs for expert systems. But I want to know what the actual costs are.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 22:43:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47811365</link><dc:creator>einrealist</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47811365</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47811365</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by einrealist in "Claude Design"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Good for crunching out some prototypes, ideas and getting inspirations I guess. Two prompts - the initial one and one refinement - took about ten minutes and used up 90% of the token budget. I wonder what the real costs are. After the IPO, they will no longer be able to subsidize token costs. The question will then be whether it's still cheap enough just for prototypes, ideas and inspiration.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 22:25:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47811247</link><dc:creator>einrealist</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47811247</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47811247</guid></item></channel></rss>