I imagine it could easily be compensated by an equivalently minor increase of breathing rate or breathing depth.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gas_exchange#Alveolar_air

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breathing#Composition

[3] 5/6 × 40000 ppm + 1/6 × 500 ppm = 33417 ppm; 5/6 × 40000 ppm + 1/6 × 5000 ppm = 34167 ppm; 34167 / 33417 = 1.0225

https://github.com/OtterBrowser/otter-browser

Though I agree today's Github is awful slow, JS is required to see issues, …

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RoldOz5YyAw

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47335268

Points: 7

# Comments: 1

[0] https://fivepoints.mattglassman.net/p/the-court-ieepa-and-th...

Though I'm not excluding the possibility that indoor CO2 concentration strongly correlates with cognitive underperformance, which may be caused by other compounds emitted by human body.

> Beginning in the 1930s, Congress increasingly dealt with the delegation problem via another strategy: the legislative veto. Congress would provide authority to the president or other executive-branch officials, but reserve the right to overturn any individual use of the authority, via passage of a concurrent resolution in the House and Senate. […]

> This essentially retained majoritarian congressional control over presidential uses of IEEPA. If Congress didn’t like an action the president took using his IEEPA authority — be it a sanction, asset freeze, or (gasp!) tariff — they would have the authority to overturn it, by majority vote, without the cooperation of the president.

> But wait, you say, didn’t the House and Senate already both vote to overturn some of the the IEEPA tariffs put in place by Trump by declaring an end to the NEA emergency that triggered the authority? Yes, they did. […] But those were largely symbolic political votes, because the Supreme Court destroyed the legislative veto 40 years ago. […]

> But even worse than that, the Court chose to sever the legislative vetoes from the laws in which they were placed. That is, the Court removed the legislative vetoes but left in place the delegations of authority! […]

> Of course, Congress could just rewrite the laws with tighter restrictions on the delegated authority, or withdraw it all together. […] If Congress wants to change that […] they would need either the consent of the president (good luck), or a supermajority vote in Congress to override his veto.

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47251456

Points: 2

# Comments: 1

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47066514

Points: 6

# Comments: 0

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47024486

Points: 8

# Comments: 1

The runaway effect is scary b/c at certain temperature (~400K) atmosphere consisting predominantly of water vapor looses its ability to radiate out more heat up until 1600K.

[0] https://www.nature.com/articles/ngeo1892 (see fig. 2b) (edit: the figure: https://imgur.com/a/ytoEXzd)

edit #2: I've measured some pixels and the starting runaway temp is closer to 315K / 42C, damn

[Angular Diameter Turnaround](https://xkcd.com/2622/)

Some (including the most popular: codemirror) go as far as putting themselves inside "natural" selection flow: they're interpreting mouse inputs, cancelling default behavior and selecting text themselves (programmatically via setSelectionRange). And Firefox deliberately ignores such selection: https://searchfox.org/firefox-main/rev/edb7c6118aa4fc5b09d84...