<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: elahieh</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=elahieh</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 09:09:12 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=elahieh" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by elahieh in "Fable 5.1 Solves the Cyphral Distich, a 370-year-old cipher"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Without a third-party check, nope. Case in point, Chaocipher ... <a href="https://www.chaocipher.com/" rel="nofollow">https://www.chaocipher.com/</a> e.g. see "Progress Report #23" the PDF there. Transcription errors galore!<p>This cipher context "rhymes" well with Kryptos K4 in many ways.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 23:56:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49690062</link><dc:creator>elahieh</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49690062</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49690062</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by elahieh in "Fable 5.1 Solves the Cyphral Distich, a 370-year-old cipher"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>"Caveats, stated plainly"<p>You should have seen the discussion of this on the Schneier blog a few days ago.<p>Someone had their agent check the solution, presumably it emailed a librarian to check that it was correct for the original edition. Then their comments read like "The BL/EEBO witness lacks it, so the discrepancy is copy-specific, not a disproof of the cipher." and "A complete 285-coordinate physical replication is still pending."<p>arghhhhh<p><a href="https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2026/09/claude-fable-solves-a-historical-cipher.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2026/09/claude-fable-...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 22:36:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49689444</link><dc:creator>elahieh</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49689444</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49689444</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by elahieh in "Fable 5.1 Solves the Cyphral Distich, a 370-year-old cipher"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Unfortunately, the totality of the evidence very much indicates that Sanborn went "buck wild" with the enciphering, he made mistake(s), or both. So this is very much in line with the Chaocipher challenge of 1990. Nice little earner for some people though.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 22:27:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49689381</link><dc:creator>elahieh</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49689381</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49689381</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by elahieh in "Fable 5.1 Solves the Cyphral Distich, a 370-year-old cipher"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I presume what the author did was plug Klaus Schmeh's top 50 unsolved ciphers at <a href="https://scienceblogs.de/klausis-krypto-kolumne/the-top-50-unsolved-encrypted-messages/" rel="nofollow">https://scienceblogs.de/klausis-krypto-kolumne/the-top-50-un...</a> into Fable 5.1 and ask Fable 5.1 to have a go. On this kind of problem it always falls back to Opus 5 anyway so I save time by starting with Opus.<p>The successor to Klaus's blog is Satoshi Tomokiyo's Cryptiana site, so a month ago I asked Opus 5 to scrape it all, rank them and have a go at solving some. It didn't get the ranking right. But I knew the Civil War Stager ciphers were ripe for solving, so I had it do those <a href="https://cryptiana.blogspot.com/2026/09/route-transposition-ciphers-during-us.html" rel="nofollow">https://cryptiana.blogspot.com/2026/09/route-transposition-c...</a><p>The art of solving historical unsolved ciphers is knowing what is on the boundary of solvability. Since this site attracts so many OpenAI and Anthropic employees, I'll mention one that was featured by both Klaus and Satoshi in 2023, presumably Spanish transposition, which should be on that boundary but has resisted all attempts at solution <a href="https://cryptiana.blogspot.com/2023/09/a-telegram-from-switzerland-1937.html" rel="nofollow">https://cryptiana.blogspot.com/2023/09/a-telegram-from-switz...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 22:22:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49689335</link><dc:creator>elahieh</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49689335</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49689335</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Racing to solve maths problems now 'pointless']]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-09-11/racing-to-solve-maths-problems-pointless-tristan-buckmaster-says/107141628">https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-09-11/racing-to-solve-maths-problems-pointless-tristan-buckmaster-says/107141628</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49653867">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49653867</a></p>
<p>Points: 6</p>
<p># Comments: 1</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 05:23:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-09-11/racing-to-solve-maths-problems-pointless-tristan-buckmaster-says/107141628</link><dc:creator>elahieh</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49653867</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49653867</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by elahieh in "Elevated error rates on Opus 4.7"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>One reason might be that Claude Opus 4.7 thinking benchmarks better on Arena Coding at <a href="https://arena.ai/leaderboard/text/coding" rel="nofollow">https://arena.ai/leaderboard/text/coding</a> ... hopefully that effectively assesses correctness. It doesn't account for reliability though.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 00:51:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48143168</link><dc:creator>elahieh</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48143168</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48143168</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Dola-Seed-2.0-Preview debuts at #6 on arena.ai]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://seed.bytedance.com/en/blog/dola-seed-2-0-preview-model-release-on-arena">https://seed.bytedance.com/en/blog/dola-seed-2-0-preview-model-release-on-arena</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47040628">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47040628</a></p>
<p>Points: 3</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 21:34:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://seed.bytedance.com/en/blog/dola-seed-2-0-preview-model-release-on-arena</link><dc:creator>elahieh</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47040628</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47040628</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by elahieh in "SCiZE's Classic Warez Collection"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>1990 to 1999, that would be exactly the development timeline of Celerity BBS.<p>Just looking at the revision history of Celerity 2.04 on Discmaster, wow, that went forever!<p><a href="https://discmaster.textfiles.com/view/43430/BBS_Software/DOS/CELERITY/cel204r.zip/CEL204-3.ZIP/REVISION.TXT" rel="nofollow">https://discmaster.textfiles.com/view/43430/BBS_Software/DOS...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2026 10:50:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46510842</link><dc:creator>elahieh</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46510842</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46510842</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Kryptos K4 summary and final guesses video]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O11UBt4j8TI">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O11UBt4j8TI</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45974851">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45974851</a></p>
<p>Points: 1</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2025 01:38:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O11UBt4j8TI</link><dc:creator>elahieh</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45974851</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45974851</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Jim Sanborn open letter to Kryptos community]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/26229389-adobe-scan-nov-12-2025/">https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/26229389-adobe-scan-nov-12-2025/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45907612">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45907612</a></p>
<p>Points: 2</p>
<p># Comments: 1</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2025 22:17:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/26229389-adobe-scan-nov-12-2025/</link><dc:creator>elahieh</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45907612</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45907612</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by elahieh in "Solution to CIA’s Kryptos sculpture is found in Smithsonian vault"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Interview with the Smithsonian researchers here<p><a href="https://zonamotel.substack.com/p/interview-kryptos-k4-uncovered-jarett" rel="nofollow">https://zonamotel.substack.com/p/interview-kryptos-k4-uncove...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2025 05:47:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45632268</link><dc:creator>elahieh</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45632268</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45632268</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Solution to CIA’s Kryptos sculpture is found in Smithsonian vault]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/16/science/kryptos-cia-solution-sanborn-auction.html">https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/16/science/kryptos-cia-solution-sanborn-auction.html</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45603876">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45603876</a></p>
<p>Points: 158</p>
<p># Comments: 133</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2025 10:56:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/16/science/kryptos-cia-solution-sanborn-auction.html</link><dc:creator>elahieh</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45603876</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45603876</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by elahieh in "French firm Gouach is pitching an Infinite Battery with replaceable cells"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>A cryptography angle in the article. Would this be illegal in the US under DMCA?<p><i>One of the biggest compatibility challenges, Vallette said, was finding a way to work with Bosch's mid-drive motors. The communications between a Bosch motor and battery are encrypted; after "a serious effort," Gouach's app and battery should work with them, Vallette said.</i></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2025 22:43:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44967283</link><dc:creator>elahieh</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44967283</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44967283</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by elahieh in "The secret code behind the CIA's Kryptos puzzle is up for sale"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Also, another example of an "unreasonable" challenge - the "Decipher Puzzle" <a href="https://cisa.umbc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/468/2017/09/ShermanCryptologia90.pdf" rel="nofollow">https://cisa.umbc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/468/2017/09/S...</a> -- from 1983 to 1985.<p>You would think that one of the lessons of that is that someone could jump in right at the end and solve it after several clues were released. That hasn't worked with K4, which is increasing people's skepticism.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2025 06:55:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44909351</link><dc:creator>elahieh</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44909351</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44909351</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by elahieh in "The secret code behind the CIA's Kryptos puzzle is up for sale"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Here's what's up for sale from RR Auction<p><a href="https://www.rrauction.com/jim-sanborn-kryptos-k4-solution-auction/" rel="nofollow">https://www.rrauction.com/jim-sanborn-kryptos-k4-solution-au...</a><p>The Wired piece has Sanborn saying the reserve should be "around $300,000."<p>It sounds like Sanborn really doesn't think it'll be solved before the auction date of 20 November (his 80th is on 14 November). If it does get solved due to this publicity bump, that's huge earnings foregone.<p>Perhaps he knows it is still an "unreasonable" challenge even with the 24 known letters.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2025 04:15:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44908554</link><dc:creator>elahieh</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44908554</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44908554</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by elahieh in "The secret code behind the CIA's Kryptos puzzle is up for sale"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Good point, and it's also entirely possible the code designer just did a terrible job. e.g. around 57:00 of <a href="https://youtu.be/JOXPYkjvDaA" rel="nofollow">https://youtu.be/JOXPYkjvDaA</a><p>As Kryptos gots a huge amount of media attention in 1999, references to him changed from "chairman of A cryptographic center" to "chairman of [THE] CIA's cryptographic center" when it doesn't even seem that it has such a center.<p>And the featured story (around 52:00 of the video) has him apparently claiming credit for helping solve a Caesar cipher!<p><a href="https://web.archive.org/web/19990501000000*/http://www.tecsec.com/Ed%20Scheidt.htm" rel="nofollow">https://web.archive.org/web/19990501000000*/http://www.tecse...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2025 03:07:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44908206</link><dc:creator>elahieh</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44908206</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44908206</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by elahieh in "The secret code behind the CIA's Kryptos puzzle is up for sale"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'm inclining to this too. I heard about it first on Usenet in the 90s, and started looking at it again seriously in June 2017 when I came across the Bauer paper.<p>But after the 2020 clues (another 13 letters), it became clear that it wasn't any single ACA cipher type, and it was probably something very difficult (because of K4's very low index of coincidence, i.e. 0.036 just below "random" 26-letter text at 1/26, plus the huge number of revealed plaintext letters "in place" i.e. letter-for-lettter correspondence).<p>That plausibly left a combination of two or more well-known cipher types, but if they were somewhat complex ciphers, the chance of solution would be rather remote.<p>Hence I always thought a "good" end to the puzzle would be like the book "Masquerade" by Kit Williams where the only guy in cahoots with the creator (Bamber Gascoigne) thought the initial puzzle was an unrealistic challenge, but Williams released clues which enabled two schoolteachers to solve it. So that part was satisfactory, even if hardly anybody remembers the solvers' names!<p>In contrast, the cribs for K4 haven't helped at all.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2025 02:37:19 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44908034</link><dc:creator>elahieh</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44908034</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44908034</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[The secret code behind the CIA's Kryptos puzzle is up for sale]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://news.artnet.com/art-world/cia-kryptos-sculpture-code-auction-2677451">https://news.artnet.com/art-world/cia-kryptos-sculpture-code-auction-2677451</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44907366">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44907366</a></p>
<p>Points: 91</p>
<p># Comments: 53</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2025 00:33:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.artnet.com/art-world/cia-kryptos-sculpture-code-auction-2677451</link><dc:creator>elahieh</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44907366</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44907366</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Most e-scooter riders follow the rules]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://zagdaily.com/opinion/insight-hub-most-e-scooter-riders-follow-the-rules-heres-what-we-found/">https://zagdaily.com/opinion/insight-hub-most-e-scooter-riders-follow-the-rules-heres-what-we-found/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44895986">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44895986</a></p>
<p>Points: 3</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2025 02:01:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://zagdaily.com/opinion/insight-hub-most-e-scooter-riders-follow-the-rules-heres-what-we-found/</link><dc:creator>elahieh</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44895986</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44895986</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by elahieh in "The $5000 Compression Challenge (2001)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'm rather skeptical of this claim that the data was compressed in 2018 because there is no further information, apart from a hash value given.<p>If it's a true claim they must have identified some "non-random" aspect of the original data, and then they could have given more info.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 24 Nov 2024 04:29:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42225920</link><dc:creator>elahieh</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42225920</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42225920</guid></item></channel></rss>