<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: elbybasolis</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=elbybasolis</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 22:39:13 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=elbybasolis" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by elbybasolis in "Google is already pushing WEI into Chromium"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Attempting to open an issue yields this message:<p>"An owner of this repository has limited the ability to comment to users that have contributed to this repository in the past."</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2023 12:41:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36876689</link><dc:creator>elbybasolis</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36876689</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36876689</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by elbybasolis in "Rocky Mountain Basic"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>After college I was doing some consulting and working on few very different projects. One of which was helping a company maintain an estimating program written by their founding engineer written in RMB. The software would prompt the user for various information and produce an estimate for labor, materials, equipment, and time.<p>It was pretty simple, well commented code, and for a while I was able to make small changes with a VM and HTBasic (<a href="http://www.techsoft.de/documents/htbasic.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.techsoft.de/documents/htbasic.html</a>). They weren't using any of the advanced features of the language. It was essentially a cli.<p>Eventually we ported it to TypeScript with a modern frontend. Now they can do estimates in the field and integrate it with loads of other software they adopted recently for invoicing, scheduling etc.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2021 14:44:19 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29649967</link><dc:creator>elbybasolis</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29649967</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29649967</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by elbybasolis in "macOS unable to open any non-Apple application"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Kali linux certainly has the pointiest sticks.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2020 01:20:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25077697</link><dc:creator>elbybasolis</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25077697</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25077697</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by elbybasolis in "Ask HN: Which abandoned proprietary software would you resurrect?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Fallout 1&2. 
These games are classic, and without GOG, basically relics of the past. The isometric turn-based gameplay would be perfect for a mobile port. It would be great to add new assets and content. It would be quite fun to design sprites in the 90’s style the games have. 
I’d be happy if Bethesda made a mobile edition, assuming they had the publishing rights to it. I’d pay whatever the going rate for a good mobile game is now adays (without micro transaction). 
The trademark of Fallout is probably too valuable for anyone to be able to get away with making a ground-up port to a modern system in an open source fashion.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2018 23:33:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18638154</link><dc:creator>elbybasolis</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18638154</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18638154</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by elbybasolis in "Quantum computers will break the encryption that protects the internet"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I see this playing out similarly to the Y2K situation. There will be a race to upgrade all cryptographic security measures currently in place to handle the new power in computation. In the beginning however those who would have access to such power would make a mint supplying a service (AWS and the like) to compute these products.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2018 10:04:58 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18262594</link><dc:creator>elbybasolis</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18262594</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18262594</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by elbybasolis in "Quantum computers will break the encryption that protects the internet"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>In that case can we start computing cryptographic products with quantum computers such that there is no gap? If we reduce the time complexity of factoring a prime number to linear wouldn’t we be able to produce larger cryptographic products? Effectively going back to where we started but with more computing power? Surely this would require easy access to quantum computation to be practical and thus a gap in power, but necessity would drive the market to make this type of power more mainstream.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2018 09:49:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18262552</link><dc:creator>elbybasolis</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18262552</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18262552</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by elbybasolis in "Quantum computers will break the encryption that protects the internet"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I’m concerned with the ability of conventional computers to keep up with cryptography in the quantum age of computation. But can’t we just jack up the current algorithms to have higher order problem sets to solve? In other words can’t we turn something like a SHA-256 into a SHA-2048 and take a hit on the time complexity to generate such cryptographic (in this case a hashing algorithm) products? Can’t we just scale up the problem size and assume that the solution will be exponentially more difficult to solve?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2018 09:40:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18262522</link><dc:creator>elbybasolis</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18262522</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18262522</guid></item></channel></rss>