Is there some state/federal law that delegates power over some things to the municipalities/cities/counties etc that allow them passing ordnance like this?

It feels weird to me that this would not be a state / federal level decision, but maybe that's just my Finnish ass.

Like for example if you think there's a possible problem, say that if there's a problem and suggest a workaround, the agent will change direction and implementation to that, even though there never was a problem.

Ie, actually, yes, shouting at the AI can (and does, there are papers on this), work.

Holy shit this was the most infuriating thing I've experienced in a while lmao, I felt so relieved when the button was turned to blue, but then so visceral "no no no no no" panic when it turned to the gradient.

Amazing

E: this is a horror simulator, my breathing is becoming shallow and fast, I love it.

Do it after you have actually made the rust version work the same as the C version.

Insane to be adding complexity, breaking compatibility and introducing new bugs to software that needs to function correctly.

Chatgpt can absolutely do the things here: it can give you files, it can integrate and show web pages that you develop, etc.

There is no need for an "agent", the chat version works just fine and is actually easier for novices.

This is simply not true. Guardrails are enforced by the compiler, and both gcc and clang have a myriad of flags to make C safe, not to mention Fil-C.

This is also not a memory issue but an actual logic issue, so Rust doesn't help there.

https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/issues/14144

https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/issues/14144

What was also interesting is that it prompted me to select a certificate that was definitely not for that page, ie. it accepted any and all certs, not just ones that are for a certain page (I have incus web generated certificates that should be only for that domain and page, which definitely have nothing to do with Google).

I'm not alone in this, also happened to my friend, and also posted to Reddit:

https://www.reddit.com/r/techsupport/comments/1u7h672/browser_asking_me_to_select_certificate_is_it_a/

Seems like somebody definitely misconfigured something somewhere. The question is then was this the direct result of the misconfiguration, or someone abusing a misconfiguration. Client certificates can be used to identify people so this is a good way to mass collect certs. This data could also be used to analyse client certificates that are around.

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48562859

Points: 15

# Comments: 8

The way llms are right now, and the way humans are, there is no side channel.

It's all about training, but even with extensive training, output breaks down if it's probability based and not hard logic and state machine.

It very badly damages credibility to misrepresent what happened. It doesn't further the cause, only damages it.

I understand the want to protest, but you do know that misrepresentation doesn't help, right?

Refusing to cease by an even organisers order will, yes, result in being escorted out forcefully by security.