<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: enough_ahnaf</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=enough_ahnaf</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2026 20:37:37 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=enough_ahnaf" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by enough_ahnaf in "Launch HN: Simantic (YC F26) – Firmware Simulation for AI Agents"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>we have thought about it, but its a name we came up ourselves, fits the bill and we have the domain for it. Can't ask for much more. its pretty rare for google to be our inbound and when we get to that point we would probably overtake that in SEO anyway</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2026 19:59:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50294918</link><dc:creator>enough_ahnaf</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50294918</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50294918</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by enough_ahnaf in "Launch HN: Simantic (YC F26) – Firmware Simulation for AI Agents"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Thank you! We will have to look into that, but theres actually an even closer to our name that we get auto-corrected to. if you really want to see how crowded naming is... just google "simantic".  Our SEO goals truly need to peak to get through</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2026 18:06:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50293360</link><dc:creator>enough_ahnaf</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50293360</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50293360</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by enough_ahnaf in "Launch HN: Simantic (YC F26) – Firmware Simulation for AI Agents"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Will be putting this out later today. We have just been updating so much that it became a burden to try to keep our model coverage upto date. But our cloud-sim API itself shows what models it can run: STM32F042/F048,  ESP32-C3, RP2040, STM32F072, STm32F446, STm32 F401. We will get this live soon!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2026 17:00:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50292291</link><dc:creator>enough_ahnaf</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50292291</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50292291</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by enough_ahnaf in "Launch HN: Simantic (YC F26) – Firmware Simulation for AI Agents"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Thank you, and for sure market is very fragmented. Which is exactly why we are starting small and modelling deep with stm32 as our workhorse here. The quirks we are finding them everyday! I have seen mcu controller behaviour from neither errata nor datasheet and thats the beauty of field testing.<p>I think our biggest difference to renode is the silicon validation and our commitment to keeping our simulation honest. I have struggled to find simulators that people actually put the measured differences and that is the direction we will go. We haven’t put our silicon validation benchmarks public yet but we will in the coming months!<p>As for legacy players, they don’t fill the niche enough. Thats why we exist and as a startup can fill this niche for the people that need it, whether its china, or anywhere else.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2026 16:32:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50291770</link><dc:creator>enough_ahnaf</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50291770</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50291770</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by enough_ahnaf in "Launch HN: Simantic (YC F26) – Firmware Simulation for AI Agents"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>We are both! The cloud service is for everyone to try right now. We have a paid local license version too.<p>But we started as local only however quickly learned thag cloud  has a few advantages. we can have seamless github integration setup for people. And quite a few people prefer when things just work with a setup on every commit!<p>Convenience of the cloud or you can setup yourself with developer license.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2026 16:19:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50291512</link><dc:creator>enough_ahnaf</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50291512</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50291512</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by enough_ahnaf in "Launch HN: Simantic (YC F26) – Firmware Simulation for AI Agents"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Thank you, yes validation is the new bottleneck anywhere we talk to people. However for us in hardware its pretty simple, The board is king! Our setups are simpler now than it will be in the next few months coming as we add in more and more components to a “scenario”.<p>But, this is a great point because we do think about what is a bench artifact from the dev boards we are testing versus something that would not show up in production pcb.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2026 16:10:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50291346</link><dc:creator>enough_ahnaf</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50291346</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50291346</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ask HN: Best Local LLM Box ?]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>What are people using for local AI setups? This is for my startup usecase where lower intelligence, cleanups, routine tasks, logs/summaries type LLM usage I can see that catching up to use in cost in the next year or so.<p>I am really considering buying a AMD strix Halo or something similiar wanted to understand what people have thought of it and where it falls short?</p>
<hr>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50039529">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50039529</a></p>
<p>Points: 2</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2026 03:19:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50039529</link><dc:creator>enough_ahnaf</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50039529</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50039529</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by enough_ahnaf in "Powerless F1 drivers frustrated by Bahrain F1 software glitch"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Amazing to learn on this thread. Does anyone know what they would use to simulate ECU problems like this? Im a firmware engineer in the industry and kind of seeing a problem like this and this thread really opened up my eye to what it looks like under the layers of Media in F1</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 08:20:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49962097</link><dc:creator>enough_ahnaf</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49962097</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49962097</guid></item></channel></rss>