If there anyone could make an App Store, then we would have a better idea of what the market rate for app stores should be.

Pydantic docs do clearly state that multple levels of nesting of Pydantic objects can make it much slower, so it isn't particularly surprising that such models were slow.

"The license must not discriminate against any person or group of persons."

"The license must not restrict anyone from making use of the program in a specific field of endeavor. For example, it may not restrict the program from being used in a business, or from being used for genetic research."

By having a clause that discriminates based on revenue, it cannot be Open Source.

If they had required everyone to provide attribution in the same manner, then we would have to examine the specifics of the attribution requirement to determine if it is compatible... but since they discriminate, it violates the open source definition, and no further analysis is necessary.

I don't think, given the facts I currently have, that claiming he didn't know they were real ICE agents is going to hold much water.

There are many different goals for developing software, and different ways to make money doing it. The AGPL can be useful for some of them, but can be rather limiting too.

In fact, sometimes when you dispose of an asset, you get more for the scrape than you have left in depreciation- and you have to take that difference as a profit.