<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: equality_1138</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=equality_1138</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 20:09:11 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=equality_1138" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by equality_1138 in "What we know about CEO shooting suspect"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I can rephrase it then to they owned themselves in this case by being so damn gullible, thus further entrenched power given to the insurance industry.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2024 19:30:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42380489</link><dc:creator>equality_1138</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42380489</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42380489</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by equality_1138 in "What we know about CEO shooting suspect"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The "libs" who lobbied for so-called universal healthcare? They further empowered these corporations and now they want to get rid of them. The libs owned themselves on this topic, obviously.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2024 16:40:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42378473</link><dc:creator>equality_1138</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42378473</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42378473</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by equality_1138 in "What we know about CEO shooting suspect"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Ever done any work for a US health insurance company? You won't find many conservatives. You will find many "free lunch" advocates who spend half their day lobbying to protect their job and their industry. They are playing politics with your healthcare costs. How is that for nuance?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2024 16:21:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42378287</link><dc:creator>equality_1138</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42378287</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42378287</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by equality_1138 in "Impending Collapse: Our System Is on the Cusp of Failure"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Could be the other way around. Failed leadership in the ruling class is promoting culture war and strife as a scapegoat. Quite easy to see the rise of race hate correlated with bank bailouts and occupy movement. Immigration won't fix the inequality problem, but could definitely fuel "partisanship"</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2023 20:33:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37040577</link><dc:creator>equality_1138</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37040577</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37040577</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by equality_1138 in "California tried to save the nation from tax filing, then Intuit stepped in"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'm not mad at congress, I'm mad at the fools who keep voting for them.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2021 17:06:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28947572</link><dc:creator>equality_1138</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28947572</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28947572</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by equality_1138 in "Bye YouTube, Hello PeerTube [video]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think when certain very talented creators get "demonetized" and they have a bad experience with customer service trying to understand why, and maybe suspect the criteria changed without they're knowing, it's relatively understandable to over-react and say their hard work was censored, even if knowing it doesn't meet the legal standard. I wouldn't let it bother you so much.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2021 00:40:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28589299</link><dc:creator>equality_1138</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28589299</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28589299</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by equality_1138 in "Amazon’s New ‘Factory Towns’ Will Lift the Working Class"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Fascinating. So do you think government is essentially doing a great job at protecting freedom and maintaining decentralized power structures? Or are they too busy building company towns?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2021 20:00:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28578822</link><dc:creator>equality_1138</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28578822</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28578822</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by equality_1138 in "Let’s talk about founder compensation"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Are you suggesting that our universities are teaching short-term thinking cowardice and greed? Or is it just certain programs? For a while I thought it was "STEM" programs that alluded most to easy-money themes in academia, with business schools teaching more of the long view and social responsibility of financing then managing a business.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2021 19:19:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28578523</link><dc:creator>equality_1138</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28578523</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28578523</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by equality_1138 in "Facebook to target harmful coordination by real accounts"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> you might find the clients or the brigading groups that were talked about above to be either in the right or in the wrong<p>This is implied in the fact that no details were given, so I just find it incredibly strange that anyone would consider it an "astute comment". I suppose you must be referencing others in the thread who think they (or Facebook) can simply request a few details and efficiently judge <i>correctly</i> right or wrong.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2021 18:14:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28578151</link><dc:creator>equality_1138</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28578151</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28578151</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by equality_1138 in "Facebook to target harmful coordination by real accounts"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Sorry, just asking questions in a manner I thought was appropriate following your response with the words 'disastrous' and 'emphatic'. Honestly it's unclear how or whether you think this brigading issue should be handled. I see that you think Facebook's actions here should be "opposed as strongly as possible" but excluding use of our legal system(?)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2021 06:11:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28574106</link><dc:creator>equality_1138</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28574106</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28574106</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by equality_1138 in "Goodhart's Law"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Reminded me also of the Taguchi loss function. To paraphrase, quality is optimized when you manage the variation of a measurement in relation to its target value, instead of emphasizing the acceptable limits. It was seen as an improvement over the "goalpost" approach. And while you can say it really applies in manufacturing context, I think it should be considered more broadly for goal-oriented measurement and engineering in general.<p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taguchi_loss_function" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taguchi_loss_function</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2021 03:39:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28573451</link><dc:creator>equality_1138</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28573451</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28573451</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by equality_1138 in "Goodhart's Law"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Fredrick Taylor was the one who developed so-called management science and obsessive measurement, paving the way for Deming to popularize a more balanced or holistic approach, ie. akin to actual science.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2021 03:13:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28573313</link><dc:creator>equality_1138</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28573313</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28573313</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by equality_1138 in "The Crime of Curiosity"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The article mentions about selling kits, so it's pretty obvious that his videos would be at least partially motivated by commercial aspirations. Yes? I called the comment silly as it seemed to be saying "I not only disapprove of this entrepreneur's target market, he is also employing deceptive marketing tactics"</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2021 06:09:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28561835</link><dc:creator>equality_1138</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28561835</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28561835</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by equality_1138 in "Facebook to target harmful coordination by real accounts"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Try to understand that the economy is structured on a system of laws that facilitate the provision of jobs and goods/services by companies, while minimizing harm and maximizing fairness. Are you anti-regulation in general, or saying something more like Facebook is a special case that for some strange reason should keep hiding from legal scrutiny?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2021 04:46:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28561315</link><dc:creator>equality_1138</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28561315</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28561315</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by equality_1138 in "Facebook to target harmful coordination by real accounts"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Are you singing praises of mob mentality and wanting to protect US democracy at the same time?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2021 04:26:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28561199</link><dc:creator>equality_1138</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28561199</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28561199</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by equality_1138 in "The Crime of Curiosity"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Exactly. I read this as a much broader critique of the scientific community. As YouTube is seen as a mass media company, it's not hard to accept their content decisions. He didn't fight it. I also believe any company that markets themselves as tech industry should not be this cagey about their relationship to science. It's an ethical question not a legal one. Jumping to the legal aspect seems like a big misunderstanding of the piece.<p>Also funny to question whether the guy is acting on financial incentives to promote his ideas. Of course he does.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2021 01:12:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28559922</link><dc:creator>equality_1138</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28559922</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28559922</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by equality_1138 in "Twitter to label 'good' bot accounts"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Twitter makes its money as a marketing engine. Who can say what marketing is deemed intentionally deceptive? I'm not a Twitter user either but it seems to me an obvious question.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2021 10:08:45 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28479574</link><dc:creator>equality_1138</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28479574</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28479574</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by equality_1138 in "A Compass for the Politics of Collapse"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Actually it <i>is</i> a logical fallacy to interpret one's rejection of a proposed solution to be a rejection of the problem. I'm not arguing any specific case for it, but it does seem to be quite common and problematic in civil discourse.<p>And the "another problem" is to misunderstand the way that money influences PR statements from powerful entities (politicians or otherwise). This part isn't illogical but just ignorant/mis-educated about wealth and power.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2021 00:05:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28362455</link><dc:creator>equality_1138</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28362455</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28362455</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by equality_1138 in "A Compass for the Politics of Collapse"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Another problem is when so many people take a politician's words at face value. It simply doesn't work like that.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2021 23:03:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28361974</link><dc:creator>equality_1138</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28361974</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28361974</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by equality_1138 in "A Compass for the Politics of Collapse"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It could be that when someone doesn't trust your solution, you call them out for not believing in the problem. Logical fallacy.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2021 19:36:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28359950</link><dc:creator>equality_1138</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28359950</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28359950</guid></item></channel></rss>