<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: eqvinox</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=eqvinox</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2026 09:43:02 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=eqvinox" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by eqvinox in "Satellite reveals immense scale of GPS signal tampering"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>We're in agreement; 1ppm is 31.5s/yr so this lines up with OCXO performance / keeping the crystal at constant temperature. It's still 1km zone of spoofability per hour without resync.<p>(GPS sync is a question of nanoseconds.)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 18:31:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48611651</link><dc:creator>eqvinox</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48611651</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48611651</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by eqvinox in "Satellite reveals immense scale of GPS signal tampering"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Knowing the (rough) broadcast delay from sender to receiver is sufficient.<p>You're citing things without understanding them.<p>First, you've mangled that summarisation, knowing an upper bound on delay is not the same as knowing delay.<p>Second, that's true for using TESLA for data streams. Not for when the timing of the stream itself is the information content. That bound on delay translates into a spatial zone of spoofability. The RFC refers to the content being <i>timely</i> (not stale) and authenticated, but <i>timely</i> is not the same as using the timing itself as data.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 18:23:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48611565</link><dc:creator>eqvinox</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48611565</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48611565</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by eqvinox in "Satellite reveals immense scale of GPS signal tampering"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'm unaware of any technology between OCXOs and Rb standards. The latter have gotten smaller but not tiny and also need quite a bit of ongoing maintenance and calibration.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 17:41:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48611219</link><dc:creator>eqvinox</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48611219</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48611219</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by eqvinox in "Satellite reveals immense scale of GPS signal tampering"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes, albeit 100ppm is bad/cheap crystals. 50-30ppm is normal.<p>The difference with a quartz watch is that it's factory calibrated with the load capacitance on the crystal, and that it's a 32768Hz tuning fork. For a variety of reasons, generating higher frequency clocks off 32768Hz is... "annoying" (huge PLL ratio, very slow feedback loop step), and typical crystals in the 10-100MHz range are just less precise and thermally stable. (Not sure why, I'm not an oscillator manufacturer...)<p>(NB: you can of course correct for initial deviation in software. The actual problem is stability over temperature.)<p>Ed.: <a href="https://www.digikey.com/en/products/filter/crystals/171" rel="nofollow">https://www.digikey.com/en/products/filter/crystals/171</a> (or, in the hopes the filter on the link works, <a href="https://www.digikey.com/en/products/filter/crystals/171?s=N4IgjCBcpgHAzFUBjKAXATgVwKYBoQB7KAbRHgHYBWMAFipAF0CAHNKEAZUwEsA7AOYgAvgTABOWOKQhUkTLgLFIZAAxNhokADYZPACYcAtGAit2kECAJoAnixwcRwoA" rel="nofollow">https://www.digikey.com/en/products/filter/crystals/171?s=N4...</a> ) - look at the options and prevalence for frequency stability & tolerance.<p>Ed.2: a wristwatch also benefits from being kept at constant-ish body temperature.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 17:21:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48611027</link><dc:creator>eqvinox</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48611027</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48611027</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by eqvinox in "Satellite reveals immense scale of GPS signal tampering"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You're overestimating how precise the clocks in normal electronic devices are. A typical PC clock is +/-100ppm. After 1 hour that's 0.36s, which is roughly 100km in distance. A good electronic clock is a tenth that. An OCXO is in the 1ppm range, but that's still a kilometre per hour.<p>There's a reason GPS satellites are used as reference clock for PPS, PTP and NTP. A naval vessel you could carry a Rubidium clock on, I guess. But on ground vehicles or mobile receivers... nope.<p>[ed.: OCXOs aren't that large, 1cm^3 box ballpark, too large* for a smartphone or laptop but not a problem on larger quadcopters, cars or military radio equipment. And 1ppm is long term drift, you can try compensating a bit beyond that, so - I guess it's a question of spending the money and energy** on OCXOs.<p>* thick specifically, can't easily be made thin AFAIK<p>** the first O there is Oven - roughly 0.5W continuous draw.]</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 16:12:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48610352</link><dc:creator>eqvinox</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48610352</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48610352</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by eqvinox in "Satellite reveals immense scale of GPS signal tampering"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I did indeed mean instant replay, and yeah the better your clock in the receiver the narrower the window of delay that the spoofer has to work with.  If you can get the time from a 5G network or NTP down to 10ms, that'd mean you can detect being spoofed at >=3km distance if the spoofer has 0 delay (which is doable with a plain analog rebroadcast).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 16:06:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48610288</link><dc:creator>eqvinox</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48610288</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48610288</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by eqvinox in "Satellite reveals immense scale of GPS signal tampering"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p><a href="https://gpsjam.org/" rel="nofollow">https://gpsjam.org/</a> (ADS-B data from planes, hence limited coverage area.)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 13:07:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48608992</link><dc:creator>eqvinox</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48608992</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48608992</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by eqvinox in "Satellite reveals immense scale of GPS signal tampering"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I don't think this helps against someone receiving the signals (all satellites) and rebroadcasting them. The effect of that would be that any receiver of those rebroadcasted signals will believe they are located where the receiver of the rebroadcast is located (just the time is slightly off/late, but that doesn't help much without a reference to check against.)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 13:03:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48608960</link><dc:creator>eqvinox</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48608960</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48608960</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by eqvinox in "Satellite reveals immense scale of GPS signal tampering"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p><a href="https://app.media.ccc.de/v/39c3-who-cares-about-the-baltic-jammer-terrestrial-navigation-in-the-baltic-sea-region" rel="nofollow">https://app.media.ccc.de/v/39c3-who-cares-about-the-baltic-j...</a> [video]<p>39C3: "Who cares about the Baltic Jammer?" / "Terrestrial Navigation in the Baltic Sea Region"<p>First few minutes give a summary, remainder is about DLR's attempt to fix it.<p>Also, <a href="https://gpsjam.org/" rel="nofollow">https://gpsjam.org/</a> (ADS-B data from planes, hence limited coverage area.)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 12:51:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48608877</link><dc:creator>eqvinox</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48608877</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48608877</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by eqvinox in "Satellite reveals immense scale of GPS signal tampering"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This "signal strength" thing doesn't pass a smell check. Whatever transmitter they put on a satellite, Russia can just put a stronger one on their jammers. Any satellite is limited by its space and power budget, terrestrial tech has no such limit.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 12:45:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48608837</link><dc:creator>eqvinox</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48608837</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48608837</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by eqvinox in "Swiss parliament lifts ban on new nuclear power plants"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> full compliance with the directive<p>I don't think I've ever seen a place fully compliant with all regulations down to the last letter. Somebody inevitably takes a shortcut somewhere. All you can do is push those shortcuts into places they don't matter.<p>Certainly not the times and culture we live in, but the "test" they tried running at Chornobyl violated their own regulations too…</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 08:07:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48596094</link><dc:creator>eqvinox</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48596094</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48596094</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by eqvinox in "Stop making swap partitions–use swap files instead"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I wonder if it works [reliably] on ZFS…</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 07:59:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48596043</link><dc:creator>eqvinox</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48596043</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48596043</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by eqvinox in "Stop making swap partitions–use swap files instead"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Anything that does<p><pre><code>  create file
  chmod 0600 file
</code></pre>
should be<p><pre><code>  umask 077
  create file</code></pre></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 03:44:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48594555</link><dc:creator>eqvinox</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48594555</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48594555</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by eqvinox in "10Gb/s Ethernet: switching to a Broadcom SFP+ module"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Having debugged flaky 100GE links on multimode fibre: absolutely the f*ck not.  Unless forced by compatibility needs, you install single mode, end of evaluation of benefits and drawbacks. SMF just works. MMF is dead for any and all greenfield fixed installation.<p>The sibling posts have already pointed out the pricing has mostly equalized at this point too, especially if you're more realistic and look at 10G or 25G. (Or just buy a pile of used 100G CWDM4 transceivers off eBay.)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 06:06:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48581401</link><dc:creator>eqvinox</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48581401</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48581401</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by eqvinox in "The Free and Open Web Is Under Attack at the IETF"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yeah. The IETF is just naive. Always has been. It's the SDO equivalent to a spherical cow in a vacuum… spherical unicorn in fairyland?<p>(There are goblins in that fairyland, but the real problem is the overall worldview/perspective.)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 00:46:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48579091</link><dc:creator>eqvinox</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48579091</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48579091</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by eqvinox in "Every Frame Perfect"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The application of "every frame perfect" to the mouse pointer ranges from neutral to actively harmful. It causes roughly 1 frame of delay, which can be enough to bump the display-eye-hand-mouse loop out of whack (this seems to be different from person to person). It also causes pointer stutter when the system is under load side the pointer can't be independently updated.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 19:18:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48520481</link><dc:creator>eqvinox</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48520481</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48520481</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by eqvinox in "Palantir loses legal challenge against Swiss investigative magazine"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Except it's not one subscription, it's a subscription to whatever today's post links to. It sums up.<p>Same reason Netflix had massively reduced video piracy, and that piracy being back nowadays.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 18:54:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48520278</link><dc:creator>eqvinox</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48520278</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48520278</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by eqvinox in "AI agent bankrupted their operator while trying to scan DN42"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> The part that threw me off is putting the currency symbol at the end. I wonder what places do that...<p>AFAIK, putting the currency symbol in front of the number is actually more rare. Most cultures treat it like any other unit of measurement.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 23:44:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48510719</link><dc:creator>eqvinox</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48510719</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48510719</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by eqvinox in "AI agent bankrupted their operator while trying to scan DN42"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Cruelty would imply a conscious, sentient subject, you can't be cruel to a machine. At best, you can be careless in your use of a tool, causing premature wear and deterioration.<p>In this case, you could theoretically argue about being cruel to the human operator behind, but that's quite a bit of a stretch.  They gave billing access to a poorly controlled machine.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 23:41:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48510687</link><dc:creator>eqvinox</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48510687</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48510687</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by eqvinox in "Linux latency measurements and compositor tuning"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>If you genuinely believe that, I invite you to look up the linearity specification on a few mice and trackpoints and post them here.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 19:19:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48508333</link><dc:creator>eqvinox</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48508333</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48508333</guid></item></channel></rss>