This is a classic question to every paid software. The answer is it depends.

Stanford wouldn't blatantly violate laws like this.

https://x.com/chrisbrunet/status/2037376353461567734

Apparently, no citizen wants to do this job? Why do we allow things like this?

I misused the word a bit.

I meant the kid had a hard time falling asleep. They would get cranky. They would take >30 minutes to fall asleep. They would get up and walk around wanting to play but they would be cranky because they were sleepy. Co-sleeping or not is independent of this.

> some job to push papers/keyboard keys around for 8+ hours.

There are tons of socializing during the work time. Nobody sits and types for 8 hours a day without moving.

There are 2 further points:

1. I'd say the ideal setting is for both parents to work and hire a sitter even though it might financially net the same (or affordably negative) as having one stay-at-home parent. Because a human needs community and diverse things to do, not just one thing over and over everyday for years. Both of the parents will be much happier.

2. When people say taking care of baby/toddler is difficult, it's almost always about not eating well and/or not sleep well. Eating would take an hour of spoon-feeding because the kid wouldn't eat by themselves. Kids wouldn't be able to sleep by themselves. You must focus on solving these 2 areas first. Once they are solved, it gets a lot easier to take care of a baby/toddler.

It's odd that we allow this to happen.

We like to hate Elon, but damn this is impressive.

Even China cannot catch up, and they can direct their resources and people to do anything.

It's been 20 years, and Ruby/Rails still can't get their typing working.

But if he made X more mistakes, you would? Yeah sure bro.

Imagine the guy made you $1.4 trillion dollars but lost $14 billions. Would you fire him?

But it's also your neighbors, friends, and co-workers who yell at cops and prosecutors to not arrest nor charge property crimes.

But I'd like cameras in my neighborhood. Sure, there's a security risk but there's also a risk of not catching criminals due to lack of evidence. Tons of crimes aren't prosecuted due to the lack of evidence.

A security risk doesn't impact average people, and it can be handled more easily.

Not sure where you get the idea that people don't care who they are friend with. They absolutely don't want to be friend whose culture is considered as disgusting.

They may form an alliance due to having a common enemy but in practice the alliance is just checking a box.

Good joke.

And these countries are supposed to be Iran's closest allies due to having a common enemy.