We've captured a slice of that on our main site. Testimonials: https://solve.it.com/testimonials Some blog posts: https://solve.it.com/#showcases on the main page

And on of the students even made a project dashboard page showcasing all the things everyone has built! https://solveit-project-showcase.pla.sh/

He even blogged about it : ) https://himalayanhacker.substack.com/p/how-i-built-solve-it-...

If I'm a parent who does not intend to take advantage of the program and therefore not to get any benefit directly, and I assume the program is done well and not rushed, I could reasonably expect:

- More parents able to be in the work force (immediately) - Better metrics for the young children entering. Especially for at risk. - Savings from less crime in the future. - Higher attainment of students when they enter the work force later. - Higher birth rate??? (probably not but this one is interesting regardless)

My understanding so far is that this leads to spending savings in addition to QOL of life improvements. And that's just for me. I want to live with less crime and less tax liability.

Asking for additional waivers imo just increases the cost in areas that will not as directly achieve the benefits of the program as stated. The only reason to ask for it is as a negotiation tactic.

I think the most important thing is to focus on the quality of the program and make sure the resources are there. And to make sure opportunities persist to prevent "fade out". I think that might have been the difference between Oklahoma's success in pre-k vs a program in Tennessee.

Htmx also may leverage js but it is meant to patch http functionality based on how http "should" function. See the hypermedia book for that discussion. You don't need to really know that it used js. You don't interact with it via js, just the dom.

As for starlette I'm not currently aware of any server stack that doesn't have some convenience library for that.

My point is that the frameworks which makes us very pessimistic every time a new approach comes out frequently try to make something really easy but once you get far enough you realize that you have to break their abstractions. And create hacks just to access the lower level implementation. I think you'll find something like this very different. When you need control you'll find everything to be much easier to decompose such that you can operate at your needed level of abstraction.

https://github.com/AnswerDotAI/MonsterUI/blob/main/monsterui...

https://www.sfmta.com/maps/muni-service-map

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27850623

Points: 3

# Comments: 0

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25500812

Points: 1

# Comments: 0

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25464908

Points: 2

# Comments: 0

The packaging is also really well thought out. I don't have to stress out about connecting setup.py with whatever publishing system we have. The settings.ini makes things sane and I can bump the version whenever I want.

A get a lot of skeptical looks when I say the source code is in notebooks, but that's just syntactic sugar for the raw source code. You still get to edit the raw code files and with one command sync everything with the notebooks. From my point of you it is close to a pareto improvement over traditional python library development.

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23813342

Points: 6

# Comments: 1

https://www.sumatrapdfreader.org/

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20683318

Points: 1

# Comments: 0