<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: eru</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=eru</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 03:38:47 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=eru" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by eru in "Abdominal fat predicts heart disease risk better than BMI"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'm not quite sure why or how estimating metabolism helps here?<p>I mean, observing the weightloss / gain or lack thereof itself will tell you whether you need more of a calorie deficit or surplus.  What does an independent metabolism estimate buy you?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 02:18:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49316299</link><dc:creator>eru</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49316299</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49316299</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by eru in "AI in drug discovery – what it is, where we stand and the path forward"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>(3) seems like a problem in its own right?  Basing science, traditional or newfangled ML, on such small amounts of data looks pretty weak.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 02:15:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49316283</link><dc:creator>eru</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49316283</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49316283</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by eru in "GLM-5.3: Frontier coding with emergent cyber capabilities"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Not really.  Expectations do most of that work.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 02:13:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49316273</link><dc:creator>eru</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49316273</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49316273</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by eru in "The other Sean Byrne doesn't exist"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> You see, the national identity number is, literally, the number on your national identity card, or in other words the serial number of the document; not the person. When the document changes, the number changes with it.<p>In Singapore, your number is fixed, even when they give you a new document.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 14:14:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49310777</link><dc:creator>eru</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49310777</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49310777</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by eru in "Using GCC's Nested Functions with Wide Pointers and No Trampolines II"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>If you have proper tail call optimisation, then tail calls are GOTOs with params.<p>Trampolines allow you to simulate that, even when your compiler / language doesn't handle tail calls properly.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 14:11:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49310749</link><dc:creator>eru</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49310749</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49310749</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by eru in "Using GCC's Nested Functions with Wide Pointers and No Trampolines II"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I can write numbers like three by just writing 3 in my code.  When I want a named number I use a syntax like x = 3.  Why should functions be any different?  A language doesn't need different ways to name things for each type of thing.  Integers, strings, functions etc: they can all use the same mechanism for naming.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 14:10:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49310735</link><dc:creator>eru</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49310735</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49310735</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by eru in "Accelerating GPT-5.6 Sol Ultrafast"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I even tell them to give me an adversarial review and tell me what's wrong with the approaches.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 14:05:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49310691</link><dc:creator>eru</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49310691</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49310691</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by eru in "GLM-5.3: Frontier coding with emergent cyber capabilities"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Well, the dotcom bust wasn't all that bad for the wider economy.  No financial crisis.  A shallow recession (and even that could have been avoided.)<p>Btw, the dotcom bust was real, but there was no dotcom bubble.  Skeptics back then said that the valuations only made sense if tech companies were to dominate the economy in the future.  Well, that future arrived more than a decade ago.<p>(More formally, if you had invested in a broad index of tech companies throughout the dotcom boom years, and had held this, you would have done reasonably well over the next twenty years.)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 14:03:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49310667</link><dc:creator>eru</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49310667</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49310667</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by eru in "GLM-5.3: Frontier coding with emergent cyber capabilities"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Not really.  Central banks don't really control relative prices.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 14:00:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49310630</link><dc:creator>eru</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49310630</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49310630</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by eru in "Principia Mathematica is modern and insightful"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You can read the original photoelectric effect paper at <a href="https://myweb.rz.uni-augsburg.de/~eckern/adp/history/einstein-papers/1905_17_132-148.pdf" rel="nofollow">https://myweb.rz.uni-augsburg.de/~eckern/adp/history/einstei...</a><p>It's a bit more involved than the one about Brownian motion, but it's still fairly accessible for the motivated layman.<p>I'm not sure why you are so convinced that this is so hard. Nor what you are trying to convince me that I should find it hard: I've literally had a look at the German originals. No amount of secondary or tertiary writing is going to overrule that.<p>Schools differ in what they teach, of course. And many of them aren't very good. But Wikipedia is always available and these days you can ask your favourite LLM for explanations, too.<p>Of course, as I said already, the books you are suggesting are probably great and fun to read. They just aren't necessary.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 14:20:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49299070</link><dc:creator>eru</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49299070</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49299070</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by eru in "GLM-5.3: Frontier coding with emergent cyber capabilities"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>These crises are manufactured by the central banks.<p>Compare and contrast how the dot-com bust did _not_ lead to global financial crises.  Nor did Black Monday, nor the recent string of bank failures in the US.<p>('Manufactured' above means that central banks are responsible.  I make no judgement on intent here.  Around 2008 it was incompetence by the Fed and ECB as far as I can tell.  The Fed started paying interest on excess reserves and the ECB even increased rates.  Twice.  Amongst quite a few other missteps.)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 11:13:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49297212</link><dc:creator>eru</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49297212</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49297212</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by eru in "GLM-5.3: Frontier coding with emergent cyber capabilities"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Why is anything going to be catastrophic?  Companies can go bankrupt without catastrophes for the rest of us.  Happens all the time.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 11:08:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49297174</link><dc:creator>eru</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49297174</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49297174</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by eru in "Accelerating GPT-5.6 Sol Ultrafast"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> I thought they'd prefer their own solutions, but they frequently preferred the other model's solutions.<p>I suspect that's downstream from their sycophancy.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 11:00:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49297107</link><dc:creator>eru</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49297107</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49297107</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by eru in "Accelerating GPT-5.6 Sol Ultrafast"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Maybe not embarrassingly parallel, but can be surprisingly parallel.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 10:58:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49297085</link><dc:creator>eru</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49297085</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49297085</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by eru in "Accelerating GPT-5.6 Sol Ultrafast"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>In German the distinction is also different from what English speakers sometimes make.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 10:56:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49297074</link><dc:creator>eru</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49297074</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49297074</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by eru in "Principia Mathematica is modern and insightful"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Oh, the book is probably good and entertaining!  It's just not necessary, if you paid attention in high school.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 06:32:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49295356</link><dc:creator>eru</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49295356</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49295356</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by eru in "Mushroom behind 'tiny people' hallucinations identified"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Hence the placebo control.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 06:31:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49295351</link><dc:creator>eru</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49295351</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49295351</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by eru in "Finite State Machines in Forth (1994)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Compare 'Lambda: the ultimate GOTO' <a href="https://www2.cs.sfu.ca/CourseCentral/383/havens/pubs/lambda-the-ultimate-goto.pdf" rel="nofollow">https://www2.cs.sfu.ca/CourseCentral/383/havens/pubs/lambda-...</a> which also uses state machines as its motivating example.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 04:50:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49294859</link><dc:creator>eru</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49294859</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49294859</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by eru in "NP-overrated"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> E.g., I've seen some people brag about some configuration language being easy to mechanically analyse because it's not Turing-complete, while in fact it's at least PSPACE-hard to analyse.<p>Isn't even just the question of minimising the length of a regular expression PSPACE-hard or so?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 04:45:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49294834</link><dc:creator>eru</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49294834</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49294834</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by eru in "Principia Mathematica is modern and insightful"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> My point is that each of the material above (and i forgot to add the original Quantum Mechanics papers) were major watershed moments in science/mathematics and hence are not easy to read/understand.<p>I must dissent.  Einstein's Annus Mirabilis papers are really quite approachable.  You don't need a book to guide you through.<p>Though if you are having fun with the book, more power to you!  Enjoy!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 13:29:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49285608</link><dc:creator>eru</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49285608</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49285608</guid></item></channel></rss>