... And yet this article doesn't link a single one. This is just a marketing post, nothing interesting here. I'd expect better from a university.

I don't think I'd want to use it as a standalone app but I would certainly be interested in it as a plugin.

Another use case that comes to mind is that sometimes I'll include some detail early in a conversation and I mean it as incidentals information but the AI fixates on it. If I could selectively edit that out rather than start a whole new conversation it would be worth the cache miss.

What I found though was that I had to use the pro mode (which I use for basically everything anyway, to avoid exactly the kind of issues this article is talking about).

I did try on normal photo mode and I think what was happening was that as soon as I covered one lens with the glasses it switched to another.

That's quite a claim, do you have any proof of this?

In the meantime, it's quite telling that Meta is choosing not to.

They want recording to be constant, impossible to detect, and normalized. That's why the camera light is so subtle and easy to cover. The more constant surveillance is normalized, the more they have data about every single facet of our lives to sell to advertises.

I think xhigh or max has a place if I'm doing something genuinely complex. But in general use it's slow and I have the impression the highest often gives worse results - over-thought, over-engineered. High or medium might give better results for less complex tasks.

I have the same problem. But I think that codex subscription limits have dropped a lot recently. They were doing a promotion through April/May of 2x usage which is when I started using it. A $200 weekly limit lasted me 5 days easily.

GPT 5.6 has increased usage a bit but I think it's not that much compared to 5.5. My guess is that there's usage limit shenanigans going on as well.

I do agree it has a tendency to go beyond scope of you're not careful but I find if I'm leaving it run overnight, calling the plan a "PRD contract" and a looping message reminding it not to go out of scope reduces that to manageable levels.

But yeah... A $200 plan that burns through it's weekly limit in a day, sometimes in 12 hours, is not sustainable. It seems Qwen / Kimi latest are at least equal to GPT 5.5 so as soon as someone else is offering those with a decent rate or subscription, I'm bouncing.

- one line for an svg icon

- four lines for the tooltip.

- study: we tested specifically healthy young adults and found melatonin may have a negative effect on this cohort. We make zero claims about any other cohort.

- every lay person reading the study, of any age: scientists just proved melatonin makes me dumb in the morning! Oh no!

TFA says they might be able to predict one extra day ahead (three days instead of two). No prediction system will ever give you a week's notice on a typhoon.

It could save thousands of lives because people can be evacuated if you can predict a few hours or a day further ahead, or the path more accurately. You can save some damage by moving ships and vehicles.

But you can't evacuate buildings or infrastructure.

You're complaining about the symptom (needing to have these checks) not the cause (if they don't, 99% of their traffic will be bots, the site will slow to a crawl and be unusable anyway).

In any case, I saw the dumb anime girl for about 2s then the site loaded. Not a big deal.

That's one of those phrases you can use to dismiss opposing viewpoints without actually engaging with them.

Look at their recent claims about their model "escaping" - there was literally a Guardian article calling them out for being hyperbolic! Again, it wasn't that they lied, their marketing department is too savvy for that. They just present it in way that's, well, marketing.

As for the actual result, I'll look for secondary posts by actual mathematicians and draw my conclusions there, not from this marketing blog post about results from a secret model.