I wonder if the same thing would happen if someone posted something on Yitzhak Rabin. I suppose that could be a test to prove whether some topics truly just cannot be discussed.

Edit: Would this qualify also as fake news: https://www.wsj.com/politics/israels-50-million-experiment-t...

If so, please explain

Edit: I think I grabbed the wrong link. I intended to find the equivalent of this: https://www.aa.com.tr/en/middle-east/israel-funded-465m-camp...

Edit 2: Correction: both apply.

All four frontier models have active contracts with the Pentagon.

And some might say, that alone means little.

But when you take into consideration the implications of the United States-Israel FUTURES Act, whether one endorses it or not, the effects of that mentioned in TFA become quite formidable, and plausibly official.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States-Israel_FUTURES_A...

Edit: I see this comment got immediately flagged. Is there any point of debate here? Instead of disappearing the comment/data, maybe enlighten me, or assuage my concerns. Section 219 was objectively unprecedented in what it seeks to accomplish. Can it not be taken for granted that it would aid such efforts as the article cites? If not, explain.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States-Israel_FUTURES_A...

It's a narrow and legitimate field when properly contained, but many are usurping it to apply to anyone who finds AI 'too' interesting or uses it for intellectual pursuits beyond coding and cake recipes.

To escape the diagnosis, one has to become a Tegmark, or Yampolskiy, or acquire a status which permits them to take the subject of AI seriously. All else are subject to AI psychosis.

I think in short, it is both a narrow field of legitimate concern, and an elitist term to throw at people who find meaning in dubious places. And in some occasions, a term to throw at people who extract real but unexpected value from AI.

Though tossing a drive-by MAGA at me was the bigger clue for the age group. The hubris part left me confused, but I suspect you are the type that considers self-definition threatening. You should consider getting accustomed to people not getting in your pre-fab'd boxes on demand. Of course, if your mob is large enough, you can bend the general rule and use force.

Edit: Mucho extra credit if you can cite a single instance of ever being concerned about corruption, especially insider trading before orange man.

In a way, it seems somewhat signaling that the precedent was long set, and unspoken rules always effectively 'allowed' it, so here I am, just being more candid about it than stale O..ld Windows have previously encouraged.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49285750

Wise people have been saying for decades that 'we' are viewed as cattle, and largely being dismissed as hyperbolic. But here it is. Weaponizing the hands directly. The most used part of the body. Showing your ID now comes with the risk of being tased®.

I have suspected from the start of this ICE slop that the entire point was primarily psychological, with immigration as the excuse for a twisted and improbable goal mostly unrelated.

Edit: Do humans never learn that dignity is more important than pettiness? They should rename the ICE as OCB, or Operation Certain Blowback.

The chemist says "I'll have an H2O"

Bartender says, "fine. What'll it be for you, young man?"

Student says "I'll have an H2O too"

And dies.

I find most in-store produce genuinely symbolic of the real thing. Makes me think the growth was due to coercion and mentalism. A palpable snapshot of reality, with a high price.

On the simulation question... Not much, but we have a long way to go before any answers arise there. I could offer my insight on the subject, but aside from being sicker than usual today, it's a tough subject to speculate on and the environment here is not necessarily hospitable, so I'll just say fair question.