Some people have no shame at all. This is so absurd it read like a comedy sketch.

I do not know if Claude was used, but I do appreciate the perspective regardless.

The US has stocks and production, but EU and china, trumps favorite economical targets, do not.

No proof to offer, but it fits with his other move when it come to economy.

There is a difference with accepting a "feature" in a product you sign-on to, and having it added behind your back.

On one side, gravatar never talked about feeding your profile to AI when he signed up, and never amended TOS or announced change in that direction (that he received at least).

On the other, the new service he use are upfront about it; though I don't use either service, so no idea on the whole package.

I personally find value in that.

Just looking at the percentage of the population in prison, or murders by cop per inhabitant, that are also good indicators of "repression", and the US might rate first worldwide.

So the closed model try to get client with their model by saying it's cheaper than employees, and then turn around to lawyer-out cheaper alternative?

Truly the american dream.

The article describe it as a gaming chip, though. Might be because of the site's target audience? I don't know them.

But as a gamer who hasn't been able to make a significant upgrade to my rig in 6 years due to memory price and redirected processor engineering funding (all of it due to AI), it really bother me.

Why would it benchmarked for AI in these circumstances?

Beside, the second page look like those unnecessary AI benchmark to me. I wouldn't recognise such for certain or be aible to estimate their quality, but it's what their summary say.

For exemple, pedestrian killed by motorist are too often not counted as a motorist issue, but a pedestrian at the wrong place issue.

1/3 of the population functionally illiterate in Europe seems beyond wild to me.

Are you talking about technical illiteracy? security illiteracy?

Or do you mean they can't read english, which is a very different thing.

Of course, it is only their employees that are impacted instead of their bottom line, they might be more tolerant?

It's all about limiting foreign build vehicle encroachment on US market.

If the airline doesn't comply afterward, it would be on them.

But they didn't issue a recall, so they wouldn't have to pay for the fix, an over 200 people paid the price instead.

At least, that's how I read the blame distribution.

Use no U.S. part, and you can sell to the whole world. Use U.S. part, and you might ne restricted to the U.S.

No way this can backfire in any way.

Those who could but didn't vote aren't blameless either.

Still a worthwhile investment in most case.