<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: eueew</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=eueew</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 08:03:24 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=eueew" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by eueew in "Google plans to invest up to $40B in Anthropic"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It’s meant to either act as a complement and/or substitute for humans. So it should be measured against those who get paid. Otherwise what is the firm paying for..?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 17:00:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47902849</link><dc:creator>eueew</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47902849</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47902849</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by eueew in "Google plans to invest up to $40B in Anthropic"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You’re wrong actually I suggest you read a book on industrial organisation and why monopoly is a more efficient market structure in relation to incentives for R&D.<p>Why do people comment on stuff they barely have an understanding of? Comical. People like you create noise.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 16:57:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47902832</link><dc:creator>eueew</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47902832</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47902832</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by eueew in "Google plans to invest up to $40B in Anthropic"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Agreed it’s far more complex than that.<p>But people who have only wrote software their entire life wouldn’t know that would they?<p>It’s like the econ prof’s who theorise about the theory of the firm but have never done it themselves.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 16:51:33 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47902796</link><dc:creator>eueew</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47902796</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47902796</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by eueew in "Google plans to invest up to $40B in Anthropic"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Is it just me or is this whole mania exposing those people who thought they were great ‘thinkers’? The takes I see are so utterly flawed it’s ironic - people refer to llm’s as hallucinating when the real halluncinations are from people cosplaying the role of management/investors when they have never done said role professionally in their life.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 16:50:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47902786</link><dc:creator>eueew</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47902786</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47902786</guid></item></channel></rss>