They probably have strong implicit pressure not to.

It's YOUR browser, a locally running software on a physical computer YOU own which memorize the cookie key-value pair a remote host told YOU to memorize and YOU return the same value later. It's YOU who allowed the cookie. If YOU don't want to allow the cookie, YOU simply not allow it.

You are technically 100% control on cookie. These JavaScript implemented in-page UI has no guarantee to respect your wish. But you have a power to disable it.

But I wonder... isn't it US specific local trend where medical bill is ridiculous? There is no way ICU cost 10K USD/day... except in US.

But if it was my first time standing on my own, that must be 6-12 months old. If so how can I recognize my parents language so clearly?

Another memory was, There was a plush toy I really wanted, A gorilla holding banana, at a local supermarket called SATY. So I demanded my parents to buy it by speaking fluently.

Later, my parents told me a totally different story. Suddenly, I started shouting "Gori! SATY! Banana!" endlessly. It took them a while to figure out I wanted a plush of Gorilla holding banana sold at SATY.

The manager's job is to manage multiple programmers to let them write code. A good manager should focus on management rather than write code himself.

But keep doing for many years will make manager out of touch from modern coding so he is starting to mismanage people or issue technically wrong order.

They claims that combining the results of multiple AI models and generate final result by using their in-house proprietary model improve the quality than using the single backend model.

It cause all sorts of doubts like: is their in-house model really exists? Is their in-house model really capable?

Personally, even if their claim is correct, such feature can be easily implemented in client side like Claude Code etc, using the equally capable model from background model to generate the final result.

I smell something fishy on their service.

Now that AI coding speed and performance outperformed most of human. But AI still need human to be commanded. Yes, you can let AI agent manage sub-agents but still, human is at the top of manager who order AI what should be written.

So human must command and final say on when it's done.

Is laziness still a good virtue in AI era?

Don't bother to use Windows?

If ISO close the C++ standard, draft and N/P numbered documents, LLVM/GCC should ditch ISO. In fact, that's the only option.

The rest of the lesser C++ compilers can't follow the C++ standard conformance well enough, ISO C++ standard will be dead in no time.