Now that AI coding speed and performance outperformed most of human. But AI still need human to be commanded. Yes, you can let AI agent manage sub-agents but still, human is at the top of manager who order AI what should be written.

So human must command and final say on when it's done.

Is laziness still a good virtue in AI era?

Don't bother to use Windows?

If ISO close the C++ standard, draft and N/P numbered documents, LLVM/GCC should ditch ISO. In fact, that's the only option.

The rest of the lesser C++ compilers can't follow the C++ standard conformance well enough, ISO C++ standard will be dead in no time.

Still, my impression is, Gemini hallucinate too much while Grok is always less capable than competitors so it's not worth using it.

If publicly accessible AI model with very cheap fee can find it, it's very natural to assume the attackers had found it already by the same method.

What? What are Microsoft doing for a decade after NVMe available to consumer grade motherboard?

Given that most git conflicts are easy to solve by person who didn't involved at changes, even for a person who don't know that programming language, it's natural to let AI handle the git conflicts.

Solving a git conflict is most often a simple text manipulation without needing much of context. I see no problem current AI models can't do it.

As git became the most popular VCS right now and it continues to do so for foreseeable future, I don't think incompatibility with git is a good design choice.

Garage Duo can out-compete corporate because there is less overhead. But Garage Duo can't possibly output the sheer amount of work matching with corporate.

Is that really? US government has tanks, bombers, missiles and tactical nukes while "a well regulated Militia" have petty rifles and motolovs.

It's very easy for US government to cause state-wide power blackout, effectively shutdown Internet.