Unless the author had live-streamed the writing process, how could we know? Humans have been exposed to LLM generated texts on nearly all channels for more than three years, so by now it would be a surprise if there had not been a reciprocal reaction. Writers imitate what they read, the tools we shaped might have started to shape us.

Something that would give a user meaningful agency. You, sir, are a hopeless romantic. ;)

https://holzer.online

When arbitrary extrajudicial killings happen at some scale on a regular basis?

There is a staggering number of unserious folks in the ears of people with corporate purchasing power.

Why would a feeling be invalid? You have one life, you are under no obligation to produce clean training material, much less feel bad about this.

Shall we put a reminder in our calendars to talk again in 2037?

...go to jail?

The bland platitudes of corporate management were mindbogglingly boring drivel already in the era before LLMs went mainstream. What we get nowadays is just more of it. That stuff should be skipped anyways. What was not worth writing is not worth reading.

> Perhaps I should explain why wiki worked. > I wrote a program in a weekend and then spent two hours a day for the next five years curating the content it held. For another five years a collection of people did the same work with love for what was there. But that was the end. A third cohort of curators did not appear. Content suffered.

A heroic amount effort of a single person, and later the collective effort of a small group, worked in the mid-90es. I'm skeptical that it will be repeatable 30 years later. Despite this, it would be the type of place, that I'd like to visit on the web. :(

[0] https://github.com/WardCunningham/remodeling/issues/51#issue...