<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: fear91</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=fear91</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 11:55:58 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=fear91" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by fear91 in "Confidential submission of draft S-1 to the SEC"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I don’t get what’s the point of non-profits if you can IPO them. How does that make any sense?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 22:19:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48453117</link><dc:creator>fear91</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48453117</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48453117</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by fear91 in "European Investment Bank to inject €70B in European tech"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Why not finance a more wide tax break for tech companies, including small companies?<p>I have seen first hand, one of my classmates from high-school, whom I didn't consider to be too bright, receive a 100k EUR grant to build an esports platform that ended up being a styled-up wordpress blog. He had zero interest in tech, never programmed, the works...<p>He had no interest nor knowledge relating to tech, but managed to somehow get that grant. Meanwhile, I was paying taxes on hard earned freelancing dev money. We were both 23 years old at the time and it was really jarring.<p>I'd rather they cut taxes for already profitable small companies. The taxes in EU are astronomic.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2025 17:34:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44032386</link><dc:creator>fear91</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44032386</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44032386</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by fear91 in "A Research Preview of Codex"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Same here, paying for Pro but I just get redirected to vanilla version...</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2025 16:54:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44007578</link><dc:creator>fear91</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44007578</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44007578</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by fear91 in "Interview with the Creator of Deluxe Ski Jump"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>A rare game where having worse PC actually made you perform better. It was easier to time the jump perfectly. I recall starting 5 instances of it to slow it down as a kid and beating records. Fun times.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 13:52:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43546798</link><dc:creator>fear91</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43546798</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43546798</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by fear91 in "What we get wrong about athleticism"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>And Mahomes wouldn’t last a 3 minute round with a boxer.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 01 Feb 2025 15:32:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42899096</link><dc:creator>fear91</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42899096</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42899096</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by fear91 in "What we get wrong about athleticism"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Calling American football “one of the most competetive sports on Earth” feels like a stretch. It’s big in US, but not that popular anywhere else.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 01 Feb 2025 15:27:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42899044</link><dc:creator>fear91</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42899044</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42899044</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by fear91 in "Biggest productivity killers in the engineering industry"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Honorary mention:<p>SAFe agile</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 18 Aug 2024 17:18:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41283673</link><dc:creator>fear91</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41283673</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41283673</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by fear91 in "Golang Sync Mutex: Normal and Starvation Mode"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>No, Haswell's PAUSE is 9 cycles, the P-cores of Alder Lake are 160 cycles. Zen 4 is 65.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2024 07:03:01 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41233021</link><dc:creator>fear91</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41233021</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41233021</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by fear91 in "Golang Sync Mutex: Normal and Starvation Mode"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It differs by CPU model.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 11 Aug 2024 19:57:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41218896</link><dc:creator>fear91</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41218896</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41218896</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by fear91 in "Jacek Karpińśki, the computer genius the communists couldn't stand (2017)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Jakub Pachocki from OpenAI is polish too.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2024 22:54:46 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41074311</link><dc:creator>fear91</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41074311</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41074311</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by fear91 in "Ten years of improvements in PostgreSQL's optimizer"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's an example of how trivial some of this low hanging fruit is, the above is a concrete case that I have personally implemented (arithmetic of in-register 64/32-bit integers). You can get into semantics and restrictions, but I think the point I'm raising is clear.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2024 18:23:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40068369</link><dc:creator>fear91</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40068369</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40068369</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by fear91 in "Ten years of improvements in PostgreSQL's optimizer"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is an assumption that a reasonable person naively comes up with.<p>Then if you actually go ahead and check, it turns out it's not true! It's quite a shocking revelation.<p>When you dig into the popular compilers/runtimes (with the exception of things like LLVM)<p>Many of them still have low hanging fruit of the form:<p>a = b + c - b<p>Yes, the above is still not fully optimized in the official implementations of some popular programming languages.<p>Also an optimization of "removing redundant function calls" isn't a binary on/off switch. You can do it better or worse. Sometimes you can remove them, sometimes not. If you improve your analysis, you can do more of that and improve performance. Same for DSE, CSE, etc...</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2024 15:24:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40066005</link><dc:creator>fear91</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40066005</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40066005</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by fear91 in "Ten years of improvements in PostgreSQL's optimizer"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The nice thing about compiler optimizations is that you can improve performance of existing CPU's without physically touching them. Year by year. You squeeze more of the machine someone designed. It adds up.<p>Imagine what environmental impact you would have if you optimized Python's performance by 1%? How much CO2 are you removing from the atmosphere? It's likely to overshadow the environmental footprint of you, your family and all your friends combined. Hell, maybe it's the entire city you live in. All because someone spent time implementing a few bitwise tricks.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2024 08:26:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40061896</link><dc:creator>fear91</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40061896</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40061896</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by fear91 in "Show HN: A (marginally) useful x86-64 ELF executable in 466 bytes"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You can shrink it further by doing xorl reg, reg. On x86, the upper 32 bits are cleared for you when using 32 bit opcodes. No need to do a 64-bit reg, reg xor.<p>Instead of doing cmp $0, %eax, you can use test eax, eax - that's another low hanging fruit.<p>It seems that you could also preset a dedicated reg to 0 and another to 1, further shaving a few bytes.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2024 22:20:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39845300</link><dc:creator>fear91</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39845300</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39845300</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by fear91 in "CS 6120: Advanced Compilers: The Self-Guided Online Course"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There doesn't seem to be a good in-depth academic resource for advanced compiler optimization. I've searched a lot and all the courses I found were introductory, the actual interesting techniques require diving deep into the source code of popular OSS compilers. I found that quite surprising.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2024 10:15:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39579873</link><dc:creator>fear91</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39579873</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39579873</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by fear91 in "Google CEO calls Gemini completely unacceptable, vows to make structural changes"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>As if he wasn't playing with the prototypes daily before the launch.<p>Maybe he should step down instead. How about that? Nah, the money and prestige is too good. Better compose a PR piece to control the damage.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2024 07:25:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39535037</link><dc:creator>fear91</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39535037</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39535037</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by fear91 in "Ask HN: How to Overcome the Trough of Sorrow?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This might sound harsh, but:<p>Maybe the wise choice is to change the path? That feeling of resignation, while a bitter pill to swallow, might be a good thing in the end. I used to beat myself over for not working hard and dedicating myself to my ideas, yet a few years down the line it became obvious the startups I wanted to build would have been made obsolete by other tech. I've dodged a few wasted years, a burnout or straight-up insanity right there. Trust your gut.<p>Why do something you are not enjoying? Life is short, it might end faster than you think. The people close to you can also disappear sooner than you think. Try to make the most of it. It's not all about making it big and being successful/rich.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2024 21:14:01 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39504830</link><dc:creator>fear91</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39504830</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39504830</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[How many legs do 1337 elephants have, if two of them are legless?]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://chat.openai.com/share/397ad495-eb98-419e-a47d-4982fdac6ed5">https://chat.openai.com/share/397ad495-eb98-419e-a47d-4982fdac6ed5</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38766707">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38766707</a></p>
<p>Points: 1</p>
<p># Comments: 2</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2023 22:17:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://chat.openai.com/share/397ad495-eb98-419e-a47d-4982fdac6ed5</link><dc:creator>fear91</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38766707</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38766707</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by fear91 in "How many legs do ten elephants have, if two of them are legless?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes, I copy pasted it (How many legs do ten elephants have, if two of them are legless?).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2023 22:11:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38766642</link><dc:creator>fear91</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38766642</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38766642</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by fear91 in "How many legs do ten elephants have, if two of them are legless?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>ChatGPT 4:<p>Ten elephants would have a total of 32 legs if two of them are legless.<p>Analysis:<p># Calculating the total number of legs for ten elephants, considering two of them are legless<p># Number of legs each elephant normally has
legs_per_elephant = 4<p># Total number of elephants
total_elephants = 10<p># Number of legless elephants
legless_elephants = 2<p># Total number of legs
# (Total elephants - Legless elephants) * Legs per elephant
total_legs = (total_elephants - legless_elephants) * legs_per_elephant
total_legs</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2023 22:07:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38766600</link><dc:creator>fear91</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38766600</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38766600</guid></item></channel></rss>