Every program that starts with 1% of Python writes more Python and gets to 20,40, 60 and than 99% of it.

> AI gets tossed around as excuse for things, but it really is finding some obscure vulnerabilities humans wouldn't have.

Which is fine, as long those using it do not do so at expense of others. As a paying Github customer, I do not wish to pay for a service that doesn't work because someone else is throwing agents at it. This is largely GH issue, not general problem.

bad actors are not the problem, Github priorities and attitude are, so switching solves that. Will other providers have outages? Sure, sometimes. But you'll be able to find one that manages that better.

No, but the ones I am paying for are few and with rather solid development record. Looking at top android apps, we have some that have very high bar of engineering (firefox, google translate), some just useful dataset (cooking recipes), but again, even the simple ones outcompeted tons of alternatives.

> most enterprise software

I am not saying enterprise software is super complex, but it is very competitive domain.

That will never happen. Sure, anyone can program something, but to make it professionally there is bar of quality and competition will push most people out. Similarly anyone can write, draw or sing but only a few do it well enough to be paid for it.

And I am old enough to see many tools that allow "anyone to program". They pop up whenever certain standards (like web) become popular, then programming goes in different direction and they vanish in irrelevance. Soon there will be a large set of skill on top of "using AI" and "chat, make me an app" will go out of the window as viable way to make something others want to use and pay for.

You'd have a better bridge, at the expense of other things, like hospitals or roads. If people choose good-enough bridges, that shows there is something else they value more.

Not by much. The cases where you can replace processes with threads and save memory are rather limited.

Most upcoming laptops now have soldered RAM and soldered wifi becomes common too.

How so? The only way to do anything dangerous using any orm I've used was when I needed to do something orm doesn't support and I had to extend it, operating at a text layer (custom db syntax or non-standard sql extension). 99% of sql users wouldn't event know how to get there.

Can you name one business that is using physical records where this is not mandated by law? All accounting around me, including banks, is done digitally. The only one I can think of are businesses run by people born before computers where a thing (some still exist). Note that governments and regulated industries can change very slowly, but that's almost always result of not needing to compete, not an intentional choice.

There are many reasons. Performance, ability to bring concepts from other domains, ability to do things browser has no api for, ability to provide controlled experience and behaviour that goes beyond common browser usage.

We can. Just every now and then some new way of working becomes popular, and at some point combining them with older ones will become undefined or unsupported.

People who had access to gold used some of it to create jewellery.

> Why have they been found all over Gallia, Germania, and Britannia, but not Italia, Hispania, or the Oriens?

Certain types of jewellery can be found in certain regions. This can be attributed to specific trading network or local preferences. I don't know if that could be proven, but makes sense to me.

Is there an alternative API? No. This is public API regardless of anyone's intentions. Though "it's weird" is really not a very strong argument against it.