<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: fjellsystems</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=fjellsystems</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 13:42:04 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=fjellsystems" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by fjellsystems in "I still prefer MCP over skills"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Experimenting with something adjacent — torget.ai, idea is an agent/tool marketplace so enjoyed this discussion :)<p>What strikes me is that MCP vs Skills vs Bespoke are all answers to ‘how does an agent use a known capability.’ How does it find one (?) is where I’m experimenting.<p>Discovery and payment at the agent layer still feels like the missing primitive.<p>Also (food for thought) the local LLM angle keeps getting underweighted in many discussions. For someone running Gemma 4 locally, there’s no tool layer at all by default. Different problem than the cloud agent angle.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 07:34:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47728376</link><dc:creator>fjellsystems</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47728376</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47728376</guid></item></channel></rss>