If what you’re positing were true wouldn’t they have outperformed their peers before ascension as well

That's how I understand OP, if that's legally true or not, I don't know.

There is value in the larger organization being able to consume documentation and commenting on it and contributing to it.

There is conceptual value in some of these things, but I find it to be overstated and the downsides entirely ignored.

Most documentation systems have a version history.

And most documentation systems are far easier adopted by people other than engineers.

This is the equivalent of pointing out that figma has x, y, and z benefits and designers are fluent in it, so we should be using that for documentation.

Though it will only validate your point.

I'm curious about this from a legal perspective.

Apple has and (probably is still) extending unpublished entitlements to developers that allow for behavior that is not publicly documented.

Your point is absolutely correct and as far as I can tell you pointed it out genuinely, not facetiously. Edit: read other later posts here: didn’t know about the bacteria part. Learned something today!

This is absolutely not my area of expertise but intuitively there are two categories of energy sources: one which releases co2 (or other climate change impacting gases) and one which doesn’t. Wood, oil, gas, coal falls into the former. It’s just a question of time as you say until the loop closes. Solar, wind, thermal, etc would fall into the latter as far as I can tell.

[1] https://www.arizonawaterfacts.com/water-your-facts

I'm not sure the ads would be in that UI.

I imagine lots of people are or have spent lots of money and time trying to figure out the type of data or connection from patterns as you say.

A more nuanced and correct statement would have been to say that it's much harder to do than it used to be, when you could just look at the mime-type or similar to figure out what to throttle.