<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: flowerbeater</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=flowerbeater</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 06:09:41 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=flowerbeater" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by flowerbeater in "ACM Makes Thousands of Research Articles Freely Available; Opens First 50 Years"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>What if you needed to link to a paper on your company's website? You'd link to sci-hub?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2022 21:19:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31718383</link><dc:creator>flowerbeater</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31718383</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31718383</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by flowerbeater in "We’re winding down Google Talk"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Or Google Buzz!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2022 20:08:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31717823</link><dc:creator>flowerbeater</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31717823</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31717823</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by flowerbeater in "Challenge: Pixel perfect design"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Even at the larger sizes, a vector won't always look great. If the renderer doesn't fudge vector edges to snap to pixel edges, you'll end up with blurry edges instead of clean, sharp ones.<p>Do you have an example? Text is essentially "vector" these days, and I've never heard of anyone complaining that text rendered on a modern screen has blurry edges. The blurriness of some text is often "cleartype" or whatever tricks are being used to make it look better on low-dpi screens, which end up making it worse on modern displays.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2022 20:00:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31717741</link><dc:creator>flowerbeater</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31717741</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31717741</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by flowerbeater in "Challenge: Pixel perfect design"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Why do you think so? 20 years ago, everything was clearly in 1X. Now, the Windows default for many resolutions is 1.5X and my Macbook is 2X by default. iPhones and Androids are at least 2X scaled by default. iPhones in the last 2 years (like iPhone 12 and 13 are scaled 3X. So we've gone from 1X only, to 2X pretty much everywhere for desktop, with 3X on the latest phones.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2022 17:52:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31716603</link><dc:creator>flowerbeater</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31716603</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31716603</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by flowerbeater in "Challenge: Pixel perfect design"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Pixel art is a fun retro hobby, but as the article acknowledges, "we create work for high-resolution HDR screens." Icons, logos, and illustrations in general should be vector-first, so they will show up cleanly on HiDPI and in the future, 4X or 8X DPI interfaces. Too many icons and logos (even the Y on the top left here in HN) look blurry on a simple 4K monitor with 200% scaling (which is not uncommon now).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2022 17:14:33 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31716200</link><dc:creator>flowerbeater</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31716200</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31716200</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by flowerbeater in "Low economic growth is a slow-burning crisis for Britain"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There's also an academic capital, New England (Boston), with Harvard, MIT, Yale, Brown, and two dozen top liberal arts colleges.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2022 02:13:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31710616</link><dc:creator>flowerbeater</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31710616</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31710616</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by flowerbeater in "EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batteries in household items"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Wouldn't the manufacturers just take over, and only survive in the lowest cost place for manufacturing? The inventors/designers would get nothing and no one would want to do that anymore. What would be the incentive to share your open sourced designs?<p>Like it'd be pretty easy for one state-supported giant manufacturer to just build every single open sourced product, and sell it direct. The whole world would buy from this cheapest producer. No one else would get anything, and supply chains would become even more brittle.<p>Another way to think about it is if knockoffs were guaranteed identical to the originals, but at a lower price. Everyone would just buy the knockoffs. No one would want to make anything new anymore.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 13 Mar 2022 19:58:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30665118</link><dc:creator>flowerbeater</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30665118</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30665118</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by flowerbeater in "Some thoughts on undergraduate expansion (2021)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Seeing the amount 50k written out like that today, it seems like a pretty good deal. It looks like less the amount of annual equity that an entry level software developer makes. It's the price of a used truck, a kitchen remodel, a really nice family vacation for a month, etc.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 13 Mar 2022 18:37:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30664372</link><dc:creator>flowerbeater</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30664372</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30664372</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by flowerbeater in "Tech journalism is less diverse than tech (2020)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think the fundamental question that everyone avoids answering is whether it's possible to tell race from appearance.<p>If the answer is yes, then there should be some specific unspoken criteria that exists, so what are they?<p>If no, then how do people tell whether a panel is diverse, or a class or company is diverse, when it's not self-reported?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 20 Nov 2021 03:17:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29285262</link><dc:creator>flowerbeater</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29285262</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29285262</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by flowerbeater in "The wealthiest 10% of Americans own a record 89% of all U.S. stocks"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I've heard this trope before, but it doesn't seem true to me. The federal government's day-to-day services include universities (through student loans and grant funding), travel (domestic and international), the quality of food we eat, healthcare regulation, and nearly everything to do with employment.<p>The local governments seem to focus mostly on K-12 schools, and police/fire; plus some one-off errands like the DMV and liquor laws.<p>The amount of federal taxes I pay is a life-changing amount if I were to get it back in a single check every year, whereas the state/city taxes of sales+property+stateincome is maybe a quarter as much.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2021 16:08:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28907058</link><dc:creator>flowerbeater</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28907058</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28907058</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[What they don’t tell you when you translate your app]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://ericwbailey.design/writing/what-they-dont-tell-you-when-you-translate-your-app/">https://ericwbailey.design/writing/what-they-dont-tell-you-when-you-translate-your-app/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28468853">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28468853</a></p>
<p>Points: 173</p>
<p># Comments: 231</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2021 12:22:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://ericwbailey.design/writing/what-they-dont-tell-you-when-you-translate-your-app/</link><dc:creator>flowerbeater</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28468853</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28468853</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[A generation of American men give up on college]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.wsj.com/articles/college-university-fall-higher-education-men-women-enrollment-admissions-back-to-school-11630948233">https://www.wsj.com/articles/college-university-fall-higher-education-men-women-enrollment-admissions-back-to-school-11630948233</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28436836">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28436836</a></p>
<p>Points: 397</p>
<p># Comments: 778</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2021 19:01:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.wsj.com/articles/college-university-fall-higher-education-men-women-enrollment-admissions-back-to-school-11630948233</link><dc:creator>flowerbeater</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28436836</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28436836</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by flowerbeater in "Economic costs of war"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The employer pays the same social security and medicare taxes as the employee and also has a cap on the social security part, plus in some cases an unemployment tax.<p>If you want to include employer taxes, to calculate if the employer wants to pay you 250K how much you would get, then it's be about 42%. At 100K, it'd be about 38% since you don't reach the SS cap.<p>Of course, there's a couple other tricks in there, like the government can embed some tax into the healthcare costs which are required for employers to buy, but then there's also deductions that are hard to turn into a percentage like this.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2021 00:04:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28204497</link><dc:creator>flowerbeater</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28204497</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28204497</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by flowerbeater in "Economic costs of war"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The 37% and 13.3% are on marginal income, as I'm sure you know. The effective tax rate is much lower.<p>California and some other states also have required disability insurance that is taken out with the state income tax. It's 1% in CA.<p>And I would count Social Security and Medicare too, equally 7.65%. But the SS part has a cap so the percentage goes down the more you make.<p>All put together, someone making $250K pays about 37% on that to various income taxes listed above. If you were making 1M income a year, that rises to 47%. For 100K, it's about 30%.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2021 23:44:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28204310</link><dc:creator>flowerbeater</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28204310</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28204310</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by flowerbeater in "The death of the ‘Millionaire Next Door’ dream"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>But there's a survivor bias in picking US blue chips. Wouldn't it make more sense to look at the rate of return for equity markets around the world? For example, the Japanese blue chip stock market has been stagnant.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2021 20:17:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28147180</link><dc:creator>flowerbeater</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28147180</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28147180</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA['Unprecedented' fraud penetrated rollout of Covid-19 small business loans]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://abcnews.go.com/US/unprecedented-fraud-penetrated-rollout-covid-19-small-business/story?id=79218028">https://abcnews.go.com/US/unprecedented-fraud-penetrated-rollout-covid-19-small-business/story?id=79218028</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28082599">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28082599</a></p>
<p>Points: 1</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2021 02:23:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://abcnews.go.com/US/unprecedented-fraud-penetrated-rollout-covid-19-small-business/story?id=79218028</link><dc:creator>flowerbeater</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28082599</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28082599</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by flowerbeater in "Why we should end the data economy"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I feel like there should be more outcry for credit bureaus and ISPs having even more life-affecting information than what is listed.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2021 04:33:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27402209</link><dc:creator>flowerbeater</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27402209</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27402209</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by flowerbeater in "Show HN: Second-Chance Pool"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yeah that's totally understandable. I'm not advocating for removing/demoting major media stuff or bumping up obscure sites, not even saying anything about the scoring algorithm should change.<p>Rather I think obscure sites should get more opportunities to be organically upvoted on (and if they don't get voted up, then fine) and not just fall off /new after a few hours only to be seen by a few people. The BigCo stuff naturally gets posted often several (different) links from different people, whereas obscure stuff is only posted by a single person once. So this is about evening the odds.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2021 23:12:46 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27000763</link><dc:creator>flowerbeater</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27000763</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27000763</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by flowerbeater in "Show HN: Second-Chance Pool"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes I agree. Like original content takes a lot of work to produce, and could get an extra chance by default. Whereas news articles, tweets, and content from large tech companies have their own promotional campaigns.<p>I'd rather have eclectic ideas and projects from HN users not be overlooked (thus encouraging more of such content), and am less worried about GAFAM announcements, CNBC/Axios/BBC news, or things already popular on Twitter/Reddit.<p>Would this be a doable change to try?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2021 22:11:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27000083</link><dc:creator>flowerbeater</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27000083</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27000083</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by flowerbeater in "Lambda School lays off 65 employees"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Looks like you made a calculation error or misunderstood your units. A credit hour is 3 hours of work, as a credit hour is "(1) One hour of classroom or direct faculty instruction and a minimum of two hours of out of class student work each week for approximately fifteen weeks for one semester or trimester hour of credit, or ten to twelve weeks for one quarter hour of credit, or the equivalent amount of work over a different amount of time"<p>So it's 2,700 hours for a 4-year degree, versus 960 hours in Lambda School, just using your method of calculation. It's also not counting the internships or summer programs that students in 4-year schools usually partake in. And it does not count extracurriculars during the schoolyear, like hackathons, interview preparation, programming competitions, student group projects, etc. Finally, you're assuming that an entire half of a college degree is geneds, which is really not the case. It's more like 1/4 geneds, 1/2 required major/concentration courses, 1/4 electives which many students opt to take technical courses in. So probably more like 3,200 (minimum) to 5,000 hours in a 4-year college.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2021 00:16:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26988452</link><dc:creator>flowerbeater</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26988452</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26988452</guid></item></channel></rss>