<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: fortuity</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=fortuity</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 02:57:53 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=fortuity" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by fortuity in "GitHub is degraded/down"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> This has been objectively demonstrated as a numerical fact:<p>While your tests are indeed objective, I don't think they're very useful. For example, why does your performance test ignore caching?<p>GitHub's summary page loads 27KiB of data for me unauthenticated, which is about 6% of the 452KiB you're displaying in your first table. The vast majority of developers who browse GitHub will not be loading 452KiB of static assets every single page load.<p>Anecdotally, GitHub's "pjax" navigation feels about as fast as SourceHut on my aging hardware.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2020 19:32:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22938511</link><dc:creator>fortuity</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22938511</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22938511</guid></item></channel></rss>