Think about compositions, samples, performance rights, and so on. There is a lot more at stake.

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45596983

Points: 1

# Comments: 0

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45280980

Points: 18

# Comments: 6

And since everything is an API, Kong also supports MCP natively (among many other protocols, including all LLMs): https://konghq.com/blog/product-releases/securing-observing-...

You can physically cut off fuel without pulling the thrust lever to idle, because the two are separate controls.

However, it’s against procedure to do so - even dangerous. Throttle should always be at idle before pulling the cutoff switch, because otherwise excessive pressure can be created in the fuel system.

Essentially this is just a best practice, but there is no interlock between throttle and fuel cut off.

Then I got intrigued by your comment in case the throttle encoder fails. Turns out there is double redundancy on the throttle encoder (if one computer fails, the next one takes over), and if both fail the airplane will run on the last known setting at which point the only possible action that can be taken is to cut off the fuel (or keep it running with the last known throttle level).

In this regard both Boeing and Airbus follow the same implementation and there is no difference whatsoever between them.

Perhaps something they I have learned is that cutting off fuel during max throttle position (take off) may have damaged the fuel system of the Air India airplane because of big pressure in the lines and that may have interfered with the restart of the engines when the fuel valve was opened again.

There is speculation that in the Air France flight 447 that crashed into the ocean en route to Paris, one or the pilots only had 1h of rest because of partying the night before. Of course it’s all speculative, and however unlikely it is, eventually it’s bound to happen that we get pilots with poor mental clarity in charge of large Boeings with hundreds of lives on board. Unfortunately it only takes one lapse of judgement to compromise the flight profile of a large airliner, even if corrected after a few seconds.

https://generalaviationnews.com/2014/11/06/vanity-fair-the-h...

I only tip when I sit down and good service is actually provided.

1. Who pays for ads?

2. And if their business is being disrupted, what is the first budget that gets cut?

If they fold and remove tariffs on the US (so the US can drop the tariffs on them) before coming to an agreement because the economical pressure of tariffs is too high, then this will result in the largest market expansion the United States has ever seen.

My point is: yes lots of negatives can happen, but let’s also look at what happens if it works out so we are intellectually honest about what’s going on here.

And I say this as an European.

But my point is that NATO is a military alliance, to call it “defensive” is just propaganda as it has shown it can be offensive too. And there is nothing wrong with simply calling it for what it is, I believe countries should be able to form military alliances, but let’s not gaslight ourselves.

Perhaps once a century the answer to this question is “yes”.

So NATO has demonstrated they can be whatever they want when the right time comes. NATO intervention in Kosovo to “liberate it” is also being used to morally justify Russian’s invasion of eastern Ukraine, since from a Russian standpoint it’s exactly the same scenario and they are “liberating” the Russian population in those Ukrainian territories.