<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: fourwood</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=fourwood</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2026 15:40:46 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=fourwood" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by fourwood in "New iMac with M6"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes. And we think you're gonna love it.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2026 14:34:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50260045</link><dc:creator>fourwood</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50260045</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50260045</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by fourwood in "Flighty Airports"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The complaint is about the visibility of the flight duration (e.g. "this flight will take 1h 50m"), not the landing time (e.g. "this flight will land at 11:25am"). The landing time <i>is</i> prominently displayed in the flight info pane. Knowing your flight duration (gate-to-gate time) is not impacted whatsoever by flight delays, so I think you're conflating these two things inappropriately.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 14:25:58 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47517779</link><dc:creator>fourwood</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47517779</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47517779</guid></item></channel></rss>