Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42175963

Points: 1

# Comments: 0

"Roughly, RAG is runtime prompt engineering where you build a system to dynamically add relevant things to your prompt before you ask the agent for an answer."

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40812709

Points: 6

# Comments: 1

"But the impact has actually been fantastic. Some highlights: - ~$1m of sales pipeline generated in 3 weeks, ~$100k already closed - ~10% of the free customers converted to paid - ~50% of the paying customers converted to the new pricing model"

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38085624

Points: 11

# Comments: 3

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34068691

Points: 20

# Comments: 9

Of course, until automation gets to be as clever of humans, any test automation approach is going to have some flavor of brittleness.

Isn't the problem with relying too much on unit and integration tests that they don't consider the end-to-end app experience? (Which, in my mind, is what ultimately matters when customers think of "quality".)

But what do you mean?

But this was at a cash-rich startup that had lots of money to spend on making sure we had plenty of QA headcount. That seems to be the exception, rather than the rule. Lots of startups I talk to are quite constrained in terms of dedicated QA, so the argument for empowering product managers to own quality does make some sense to me.

https://www.brex.com/ https://mercury.com/

You just have to remember that they're just like any other online review: you mostly hear from the very happy or very unhappy customers OR the ones that got asked by the company to leave a review (perhaps in return for an incentive).