[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gESY87hn7_Q

> Nobody tells this to people who are beginners, I wish someone told me. All of us who do creative work, we get into it because we have good taste. But there is this gap. For the first couple years you make stuff, it’s just not that good. It’s trying to be good, it has potential, but it’s not. But your taste, the thing that got you into the game, is still killer. And your taste is why your work disappoints you. A lot of people never get past this phase, they quit. Most people I know who do interesting, creative work went through years of this. We know our work doesn’t have this special thing that we want it to have. We all go through this. And if you are just starting out or you are still in this phase, you gotta know its normal and the most important thing you can do is do a lot of work. Put yourself on a deadline so that every week you will finish one story. It is only by going through a volume of work that you will close that gap, and your work will be as good as your ambitions. And I took longer to figure out how to do this than anyone I’ve ever met. It’s gonna take awhile. It’s normal to take awhile. You’ve just gotta fight your way through.

I think listening and transcribing is great advice. Careful listening will help to improve your own listening ability and taste. It also helps to demystify why something is great.

But it's also going to be a struggle - especially at first. You have to be prepared to struggle, a LOT. Most people won't be able to keep at it, and that's one of the things that separates the greats from everyone else.

I would love to see a Nintendo Switch port of this game, if anyone is interested in making one!

> Traditional planners impose rigid boxes and neatly separated days. Gradience Diary rejects that structure entirely.

> Using a soft gradient instead of lines, it allows users to expand or shrink their writing space depending on their schedule. Tasks can flow across days naturally, mirroring how time actually feels—fluid, uneven, and continuous.

That being said, the white text on light gray background feels more like pretentious design than actual useful design.

I know there is OpenWrt, but my experience is that is more geared toward running on embedded wifi hardware than an x86 machine. The x86 install comes with a tiny root partition that's actually pretty difficult to resize, for example, and upgrades are quite brittle compared to standard Linux distros.

And there's also pfSense and OPNsense, but these run on FreeBSD which seems to lag behind Linux for hardware support. There's no support for the Aquantia AQC113 NIC, for example (although it looks like this may finally have been added in the last month or so).

Something like an Ubuntu Appliance [1] would be quite nice.

[1] https://ubuntu.com/appliance

It looks like the current price on Amazon for the Raspberry Pi 4 4GB is ¥18,800 (~$117 at current rates), which is indeed expensive AF. Oddly, the Raspberry Pi 5 4GB is priced about the same, at ¥18,950 (~$119).

Considering inflation and the speed increases over the 4, the Raspberry Pi 5 price doesn't seem too unreasonable to me. But having the price go up well over ¥10,000 definitely takes it out of the realm of impulse buy and more into something I would only buy if I had a specific and urgent need. So I can definitely see this killing off a good chunk of the hobbyist market.

As it stands, my two older Pis are currently sitting unused in a closet, so I would definitely try to use those before buying anything new.

My big regret at the moment is not buying a 4TB M.2 SSD last year when prices were dipping down below ¥30,000. Now they have more than doubled to ¥65,000 or more. I had one in my cart, but decided not to buy it with the rationale that "well I still don't need the space right now, and the price per TB will probably come down even further by the time I do need it". That is, after all, the way that prices on computer component have worked for most of my life.

But for other apps where interactions tend to be brief like Finder, Messages, Notes, Music, etc - yeah I don't usually expand them to full screen.

[1] https://rectangleapp.com/

I remember really liking the 3dfx splash screen[1] for some reason. Maybe because it was the only thing that actually ran smoothly on that card. But still, I was a loyal 3dfx user - probably because of their marketing which someone else mentioned in the comments - and was sad when it went out of business a couple years later.

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LanTZ_AnAso

I think most Americans just like their cars and are reasonably happy with the status quo. They can be receptive to incremental improvements to public transportation, cycling, and pedestrian infrastucture, but they bristle at the idea of turning their city into a "car free city" (which is what the parent is suggesting) or being told they are wrong for liking their car.

I agree with you insofar as I am always in support of making cities more friendly for pedestrians and cyclists, and like the idea of closing off parts of cities to cars.

But to not even acknowledge the benefits to society of a technology which can reduce serious traffic accidents by 90% just feels hopelessly extreme to me.

That being said, if they have a strong presence on Google Maps with plenty of positive reviews, photos, menus, hours, etc., then that's usually good enough for me. At least the info on Google Maps is publicly visible without logging in, and reasonably well organized. But even then, I do often find myself looking for the "Website" link on Google Maps and feeling frustrated when there isn't one.

Relying solely on Facebook or Instagram feels a bit to me like having an @aol.com email address back in the day.

I haven't built a basic website in years, so I'm a bit out of the loop, but I would probably go with Google Sites if I wanted to set up a simple business page. It's got a WYSIWYG editor, it's free, it has support for custom domains, and presumably it will play nicely with Google SEO.

> Debuting with Launch Package starting at $57,990 (available for limited time), the Performance trim is the most capable R2 on- and off-road. This dual-motor AWD variant delivers a staggering 656 horsepower and 609 lb-ft of torque, capable of launching R2 from 0-60 mph in as quick as 3.6 seconds and offering an EPA-estimated range of up to 330 miles

The R2 Performance "Launch Package" trim at $57,990 looks like a clear winner to me compared to the Model Y Performance which starts at $57,490. Slightly more range, better interior and exterior design, and a stupid amount of horsepower.

> An additional R2 Standard variant will arrive in late 2027 starting around $45,000, offering 275+ miles of estimated range.

But when it comes to the more affordable trims, the Model Y may still have an edge. You won't actually be able to order a R2 Standard for $45,000 until late 2027 (and that's assuming the price doesn't change by then), whereas you can buy a base Model Y for $40,000 today.

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47359004

Points: 3

# Comments: 1