Thoughtcrime -like territory and self-sensorship. The AI safety lobby is such a vile influence on the freedom of expression and communication via technology (since AI is starting to eat up rest of technology).

I guess the main problem is positioning AI tools as "human-equivalent" creators by the big AI corps. If they were positioned simply as "better OCR and proofreading" people would attribute to them as much responsibility as they would to a - say - typewriter and we would not need to have this nonsense.

I do realize most of the valuation comes from the positioning of "our TAM is the global salary base of 50 trilion and we aim to supesede human workers in the near future" which implies they need to position this technology as "human equivalent" or that valuation is no longer as credible.

Some problems appear almost as industrial invariants.

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49277246

Points: 3

# Comments: 2

But ”top of the curve reached” feels like the likelier scenario.

Ofc if the model has some critical bugs that’s another matter.

If that's your normal poop maybe seek medical advice.

If you don't mind - what's your specific setup when debugging Sokol, I might start from replicating that workflow?

Nothing in real time graphics _actually_ is cross platform. You are always programming a vendor hardware.

"Cross platform" really has no value in graphics programming, honestly, when discussing the lowest level programmable api.

You always need to explicitly say which platforms you target, and then test on those platforms.

The main questions should be "on which platform will my users run it" and "can I debug and test this".

So if you are starting out - pick out the easiest api for you. Don't go looking for universality as a value on it's owm (if you want universal rendering, choose CPU rendering. if you want high perf - choose your GPU platform(s) explicitly).

Having shipped non-trivial WASM code in two projects That's not a positive thing. WASM is stuck in zone between living and the dead - just good enough (barely) to merit creating production code when you need the perf in browser but not good enough to register as industrial quality tool as it's not possible really to debug a WASM application.

If you really, really need the perf in your browser app, WASM may be the only option, but it's not really a good one.

IMHO she is just not from US. US culture _is_ totally foreign to anyone not from there.

Read the part where she describes her interactions with New Zealand prime minister and you will get it. That part to me feels natural (I'm from Finland). Everything else in the book reads like absurdist black comedy to me and not how I would expect people to behave normally.

Ok the details on Zuckerberg and ”Lean In” Sandberg _are_ bizarre. Which makes it a super fun read.

Oh didn’t know that! What is the best for ”compiles to wasm in browser” featureset?

I'm so happy we have HN with likeminded people and no noise.

The routine in Tabata’s original HIIT work was just cycling.

Crossfit afaik is a more complex affair than just cycling.

So is the risk of injury due to specific movement or the interval quality of the movement?

Oh! I didn't know about this. Are there any references you could quote?