<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: funimpoded</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=funimpoded</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 09:43:51 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=funimpoded" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by funimpoded in "Appearing productive in the workplace"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> I agree with everything you've said, but don't you think quite a lot of things have also been like this before, just to a lesser degree?<p>That’s exactly the reason LLMs and friends are so dangerous to companies, and it’s so hard for them to resist using them in useless/counter-productive ways. They’re excellent at faking signs of effort and work that companies can hardly help but reward, absent any actual way to measure manager effectiveness (and approximately nobody knows how to measure that, in the wild). This takes the form of gilding and padding on a lot of communication, none of which adds actual value but it does cost money directly and indirectly (time wasted sorting out which parts of a document are intentional and meaningful, and which are plausible but irrelevant LLM inventions, for instance)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 21:46:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48042299</link><dc:creator>funimpoded</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48042299</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48042299</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by funimpoded in "Appearing productive in the workplace"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I increasingly see “AI” as a sort of virus tuned to target management, specifically. Its output is <i>catnip</i> to them, and it’s going to be unavoidable for those who want to look good to superiors and peers (i.e. the #1 priority for managers) even as it adds <i>no actual value whatsoever</i> to what they do. People under them, too, will have to start burning tokens on bullshit to satisfactorily <i>perform</i> competence and “doing work”. Meanwhile, <i>none of this is actually productive</i>. It’s goddamn peacock feathers.<p>It’s like some kind of management parasite. I’m not even sure at this point that it’s going to lead to an overall productivity increase <i>whatsoever</i> for most sectors, because of this added drag on everything.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 18:44:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48039975</link><dc:creator>funimpoded</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48039975</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48039975</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by funimpoded in "Knitting bullshit"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It reminds me of how movie special effects making-ofs got super boring when most of the work started being done with computers end-to-end.<p>But with everything.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 18:13:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48039566</link><dc:creator>funimpoded</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48039566</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48039566</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by funimpoded in "The fun has been optimized out of the Internet"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>“You want to play house, you got to have a job. You want to play very nice house, very sweet house, then you got to have a job you don't like. Great. This is the way ninety-eight-point-nine per cent of the people work things out, so believe me, buddy, you've got nothing to apologize for.”<p>- An older neighbor counseling the has-things-relatively-great-but-unhappy-anyway protagonist in Richard Yates’ <i>Revolutionary Road</i></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 15:47:33 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48024133</link><dc:creator>funimpoded</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48024133</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48024133</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by funimpoded in "Empty Screenings – Finds AMC movie screenings with few or no tickets sold"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> at the same time it's unbelievably sad that in recent years about 70% of the movies i saw at a cinema were multiple decades old.<p>There are literally thousands of good movies released between ~1890 and last year.<p>It’s improbable more than a hundred or so will come out this year that’re worth your time, and they’ll be harder to sort from the junk this close to release.<p>If anything, it’s amazing new movies have as large an audience as they do.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 12:09:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48021358</link><dc:creator>funimpoded</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48021358</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48021358</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by funimpoded in "Rumor: Disney to Remove Star Wars Sequel Trilogy from Timeline"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Lots of these franchise-connected series are flabby as hell. Netflix’s marvel series were almost all very bad about this, but so are most of the Disney Marvel series. On the Star Wars side, whatever positive qualities they may exhibit, Asoka and the Kenobi show both could have used large cuts. Even the relatively-speaking excellent Andor often doesn’t make effective use of its time.<p>I’m not sure what it is about the economics of this form of the medium that causes that to happen.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 23:47:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48016410</link><dc:creator>funimpoded</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48016410</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48016410</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by funimpoded in "Stop big tech from making users behave in ways they don't want to"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> I don't think it's that compelling to say "obviously no one wants to be on Instagram and they're getting manipulated into it." ...yeah they do! The question is can you make a compelling case that spending time on it is harmful.<p>I want to follow news and deals from a handful of vendors and local businesses I like a lot. The best way to do that is following them on instagram. It’s the only reason I signed up and installed the app. If it’d been one or two, I’d not have bothered, but it’s that way for lots of them.<p>I never want to see the “feed”. I would disable it if I could. I would make it default to my “following” view if I could. Instagram so very much wants me not to do that that they went out of their way to make it impossible to achieve that even with iOS’ built in shortcut-like system (you used to be able to).<p>As a result, sometimes I get distracted by one or two of the top items on the feed. That doesn’t mean I actually want to see them. That I open the app once every couple days doesn’t mean I like the app. I think it’s terrible.<p>People taking what folks do <i>with a sharply constrained set of options</i> as an expression of “why they want” or revealed preference or whatever is frustratingly wrong.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 23:25:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48016278</link><dc:creator>funimpoded</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48016278</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48016278</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by funimpoded in "Rumor: Disney to Remove Star Wars Sequel Trilogy from Timeline"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Funny, the deeper I get into film the more I respect how much the original trilogy does really well. Especially the first two, Jedi’s got some “I have a story I want to tell a certain way but am stuck with more characters than I need and refuse to budge on either front” issues in the script, among other script issues (some giving us a preview of problems that would really come to the front in the prequels)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 20:02:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48014177</link><dc:creator>funimpoded</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48014177</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48014177</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by funimpoded in "Rumor: Disney to Remove Star Wars Sequel Trilogy from Timeline"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Disney can do whatever it wants if it restores and releases a 4K version of the theatrical cuts of the original trilogy, something the fan base has wanted for decades at this point. I won't hold my breath.<p>We have 4k77 and the follow-up projects. I doubt Disney would release anything I’d prefer to those. They would probably find a way to make their version slightly worse.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 19:49:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48014017</link><dc:creator>funimpoded</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48014017</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48014017</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by funimpoded in "Rumor: Disney to Remove Star Wars Sequel Trilogy from Timeline"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>TLJ was almost great, but clearly needed to see Rey go dark at the end, while Kylo turns away from the dark side, and we get a role-reversed third movie. It was heading there <i>so clearly</i> that I have to think juking and doing the obvious, boring thing was a studio meddling issue. “Ok no you can do a lot but you can’t do <i>that</i>.”</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 19:45:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48013966</link><dc:creator>funimpoded</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48013966</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48013966</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by funimpoded in "Does Employment Slow Cognitive Decline? Evidence from Labor Market Shocks"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yeah, questions I have: 1) what’s the effect for countries with humane amounts of paid leave (e.g. France’s 7ish weeks plus ten or so holidays) and working hours; and 2) so how about, you know, <i>the idle rich</i>? Should we be forcing them to work 40 hours as gas station clerks, for the good of their mental health? Should we forcibly deny them access to their money sometimes so they have to get a job every now and then?<p>I suspect what’s actually going on is that decades on end of employment and the stress of the constant threat of financial ruin causes substantial psychological trauma and absolutely destroys a person’s social <i>self</i> and life, and the idle rich are actually doing fine despite not having jobs, and people in countries that let you live a little bit of life still in your “working years” don’t see this effect so strongly. If that’s true, then it’s incredibly fucked up that the prescription is “more of the thing that robbed you of your humanity to begin with… all to further enrich the idle rich who are not so-traumatized”</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 17:23:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48011810</link><dc:creator>funimpoded</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48011810</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48011810</guid></item></channel></rss>