so the problem of bypassing age verification by hacking saved files doesn't arise at all!

/s

I keep triggering it by accident while trying to get back to the latest messages in active groups. I am not talking about a weird edge case. It happens during a very normal interaction in a busy chat.

What bothers me is that this is a high consequence action attached to a very common gesture. In a one to one chat that would already be annoying. In a group, it feels worse because there is an immediate social cost to getting it wrong.

I am curious how people here think about this kind of design choice.

Is this just a tradeoff where the product team optimized for speed and discoverability over safety? Or is this simply bad interaction design?

More broadly, why do large chat apps keep binding disruptive actions to gestures that are close to ordinary navigation?

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47441464

Points: 1

# Comments: 0

all the carbon storage methods (efficient and otherwise) studied so far could be immediately put into action.

In addition to the immediate reduction in the use of fossil fuels for energy production, the scenario could be completely changed in 10 years, water could be desalinated, desertification reversed, etc.

Free and unlimited energy would be the solution to everything. The question is whether we will get there before it's too late... and perhaps AI is the answer?

2. no if you are on subscription, it's the same, at 20$ codex 5.4 xhigh provide way more than 20$ opus thinking ( this one instead really can burn 33% with 1 request, try to compare then on same tasks ) also 8x .. ??? if you need 1M token for a special tasks doesn't hit /fast and vice-versa , the higher price doesn't apply on subscription too..

3. false, i'm on pro , so 10x the base , always on /fast (no 1M), and often 2 parallel instances working.. hardly can use 2% (=20% of 5h limit , in 1h of work ( about 15/20 req/hour) ) , claude is way worse on that imo

pro with the 20$ subscription , from the gemini.google.com site , initially the request was routed to nano banana,

so I had to change the prompt and had to be very specific about not generating the image directly, here the exact prompt :

"I want the html svg code for that ( not the generated image) , generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle"

meta uses amd mi300x for all inference and which bought 173.000 gpu ( 40% of their total gpu count ) according to that report https://www.cnbc.com/2023/12/06/meta-and-microsoft-to-buy-am...

and as I've said, I'm not even confident in performing a firmware reset at this point given that I would probably get only the version released with the tv without any successive update ( anyway not a solution for everyone )

however the bugs are not solved, however the TV remains very slow and I do not even have the courage to do a reset of the TV sw because I do not know if I could reinstall the sw to a recent version (or it would remain with the first factory beta because the updates are deprecated anyway), it is a 7 year old 65" Sony Bravia for example (led, 4k, i'm good with video/audio I don't want to change it but i'm almost forced to.. ) , the menus are very slow, some recording and playback functions of content from the line crash (since the latest updates) and I often have to restart it.... all for a non-replaceable integrated soc of $50

but the tv anyway becomes obsolete, and lacking security updates also potentially a danger for my home network and for the internet in general? in addition to losing some essential functions that only the soc integrated in the tv system can provide? would it have been enough to move the computational part containing the cpu, the memory and the sw on an external hw so as to be able to swap it (proprietary or not, but at least upgradable!)