"Capture the daily moments that define you. Voice the hidden details and tell the story only you can tell."

"We may sell, transfer or otherwise share [..] including personal information"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doramad_Radioactive_Toothpaste

And that really makes me wonder, if 30 tokens for a robot can be so expressive that they replace 600 mio simulation steps?

Or the alternative would be that they just assume that the given trajectory is equally optimal for each robot, which to me seems like a HUUUUGE assumption. But if that's the case, then the results of this technique would be highly misleading, as they would tell you the robot is excellent for 1 example movement, while you wouldn't know that a tiny change to your example movement might make the situation much better overall with a different robot.

[1] https://youtu.be/TTyjvPVFbNw?si=gU8zTfUyXVIMyvyp&t=697

And as long as there's enough attractive women who are impressed by loud cars, there will be guys with loud cars. I also dislike loud cars. But I'm at a loss as to how one would fix the root cause. Pull requests welcome ;)

And, yes, I share your impression. That car is about him trying to enforce attention by subjecting other people to his car.

AI won’t.

For example, the code base contains a physical controller. It’s closed loop in that it can react in realtime to changes. But it’s a slightly untypical implementation because this one can even look into the future through simulations. But Fable does not understand that. Instead, I need to remind it every 30 minutes that this is closed loop. It keeps wrongly claiming that the controller was open loop and then based upon that it will make up constraints that don’t actually exist.

How do you differentiate from other open source AI CAD solutions? I’ve also had a good experience with Claude Code and CadQuery, which is a Python toolkit for generating CAD designs based on OpenCascade. I.e. what’s your moat?

And given that you’re YC funded .. what’s your plan for millions in MRR?

I’m asking because I would like to launch some useful open source tools myself (but for PIM, not CAD) and I just can’t figure out how to make open source sustainable, let alone profitable enough for hockey stick revenue growth. Any tips? Book recommendations?

And, btw, the bang per buck that I got from OVH was better than EC2.

In the past, I got good results with trying to reduce the variance in entropy in-between tokens, which you can implement very easily by starting with each single character as its own token and then doing a greedy merge of the most numerous outlier token pairs in a loop until you reach your desired token count. https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.12693

I built 3 products from idea to paying customers. So I can help your startup with architecture, implementation plans, and writing specs that you need to keep vibecoding sane. Depending on whether I get into YC (or most likely not, applied with just an idea), I might have free time coming up in the upcoming months.

https://hajo.me/cv/

1. There's plenty of good open TTS models for EU languages: Fish, CosyVoice, Voxtral

2. KugelAudio claims to beat ElevenLabs, but so do Chatterbox-Turbo and Fish Audio S2 Pro.

3. Their 39ms latency is not a strong technical differentiator from Fish at 100ms.

=> It's a deployment business on top of a commodity model. In my opinion, there is no technical moat to defend them from competition.

Their angle is EU sovereignty, which I very much like, but I don't see how their API (where you need to trust them) could be better at sovereignty than an open model which can run air-gapped with no trust needed. But I mean YC is in the VC business so there must be some angle how KugelAudio could 100x their current valuation. Otherwise, they wouldn't be attractive to VC money.

Does anyone know what KugelAudio's unique angle is?

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48358446

Points: 4

# Comments: 1

And I didn’t expect: VR streaming works flawless, too. I just had to buy a WiFi 6 usb dongle.