<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: gabble</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=gabble</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 18:41:46 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=gabble" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by gabble in "Using AI to write better code more slowly"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>From [1]<p>The scientific study of multitasking over the past few decades has revealed important principles about the operations, and processing limitations, of our minds and brains. One critical finding to emerge is that we inflate our perceived ability to multitask: there is little correlation with our actual ability. In fact, multitasking is almost always a misnomer, as the human mind and brain lack the architecture to perform two or more tasks simultaneously. By architecture, we mean the cognitive and neural building blocks and systems that give rise to mental functioning. We have a hard time multitasking because of the ways that our building blocks of attention and executive control inherently work. To this end, when we attempt to multitask, we are usually switching between one task and another. The human brain has evolved to single task.<p>[1] <a href="https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7075496/" rel="nofollow">https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7075496/</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 13:16:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48279423</link><dc:creator>gabble</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48279423</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48279423</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by gabble in "AMD’s aggressive pricing update on the EPYC 7371"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>When it comes to servers its even more true as you're buying the platform as well as the CPU, the CPU is important to be sure but the platform features are even more so for running the hardware at scale.<p>A simple example, for a long time you couldn't PXE boot a server from a 10Gb NIC while using AMD chipsets. So every AMD system needed a 1Gb NIC cabled and maintained just to build the server vs a single 10Gb NIC on an Intel platform. That scales out for hundreds of servers now you need a 1Gb fabric and the associated switches etc just to allow you to build your systems.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2018 13:29:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18627444</link><dc:creator>gabble</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18627444</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18627444</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by gabble in "Google accused of stealing balloon network tech behind Project Loon"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Also from the complaint something that really stood out me:<p>"34. In a March 21, 2014 TED interview with journalist Charlie Rose regarding Project
Loon, Google co-founder Larry Page claimed that Google had been thinking of the idea of
launching balloons for “five years or more.” During the course of the interview, Mr. Rose asked
“But are you at the mercy of the wind?” to which Mr. Page responded: “Yeah, but it turns out, that
we did some weather simulations which probably hadn’t really been done before, and if you
control the altitude of the balloons, which you can do by pumping air into them or other ways, you
can actually control roughly where they go, and so we think we can build a worldwide mesh of
these balloons over the whole planet.”<p>35. As set forth above, however, Space Data had reduced this theory and simulations to
actual practice and had conducted over 15,000 flights and accrued over 100,000 flight hours of
such constellations in order to understand the wind patterns by the time Larry Page and other
individuals from Google had visited Space Data. This concept of “if you control the altitude you
can actually control roughly where they go” was something Space Data demonstrated in February
2008 to Larry Page personally with over a dozen balloons in the sky which were actively flying at
Space Data’s network control center."<p>The comment from Page seems a little disingenuous if the statement from Space Data is true, of course it's a complaint so everything needs to be taken with a grain of salt but if it's true that seems pretty damning.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2016 09:55:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11921640</link><dc:creator>gabble</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11921640</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11921640</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by gabble in "Raspberry Pi 3 on Sale"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>As far as I can tell $35 is approximately £26 ex VAT which is then 20% additional cost for UK customers i.e the £30 prices your seeing at most UK resellers, aimed at UK customers.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 29 Feb 2016 14:15:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11195528</link><dc:creator>gabble</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11195528</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11195528</guid></item></channel></rss>