> Tested on one device: the Kobo Clara BW (N365, device code 391), firmware 4.45.23697. Every device write is gated on an exact match of framebuffer identity, geometry, device code, serial model prefix, firmware version and kernel release, so a different reader is refused rather than guessed at.

I can't stop reading "gated" on LLM output lately.

Anyways, I wish this worked on my Libra :<

We even got an isitchristmas.com-like website to track this (https://hayahora.futbol/). I admit I find it a bit amusing.

I didn't have the time to actually think about any "arguments" at all tbh it's just a knee jerk reaction as I get ready to log off for the weekend. Not actually looking to argument for or against your post at all lol.

  $ apt-cache policy rsync | grep Installed
    Installed: 3.4.1+ds1-7ubuntu0.2
  $ sudo apt-mark hold rsync     
    rsync set on hold.

To be honest I haven't done the setup for sending a handful of emails but IPs sending hundreds/thousands per day it's fine as long as you don't start spamming people and get flagged.

[1]: https://github.com/nosarthur/gita/

I don't like all toggles to be gone since dark mode quality varies a lot, and also I may want some sites or apps one way and some another way. So removing the choice and slapping all configuration under a single "dark/light" browser toggle really annoys me, especially when sites stop providing the toggles because it's more convenient to just use the CSS property and do less. To me it's another step in the dumbing down of the UIs that I regret.

Perfectly ok with defaulting to that global setting though.

Similar vibes to the relative date infection with no option to opt out and get the full date in most sites nowadays.

EDIT: status page now reflects the outage.

[0] https://www.cloudflarestatus.com/

Not as big in scope, though, but great introduction.

Just back from a reading session in my Kobo, and I sent this article to it of course :) (through Firefox/Pocket). I can even read in the swimming pool (it's water resistant), nothing better than reading in sunglasses halfway in on a sunny day, awesome!!! And it doesn't weigh as much as some books. While I still prefer paper for certain reads, it has definitely helped get back into the habit of reading real books/reading more, so lost to smartphones and social media / "sugar" information type content these days. So convenient in terms of size/weight/number of books you can carry, while being easy on the eyes. No distracting crap, either, as TFA mentions.

Long live e-ink, whatever device you like most!!

You're right in that most of the time, the directional probability of the market is close to 50% for a 1:1 trade.

There are instances where the directional probability is significantly above 50% to make a trade have a positive EV (if it's not 1:1, the baseline is not 50%, and there are similarly moments where the directional probability for a different risk-reward is above its baseline for some direction). Different strategies tailor to different RRs, but you can absolutely find those entries.

However, as you said it's easy to get caught up in the illusion of profitability for a given market condition. For example, in a strong bull market like the post COVID stimulus, you could trade to the long side in a large timeframe and just win money because of the anomaly of such a protracted spike in the daily charts.

That's not a sustainable strategy though which explains what happened to your friends. A price action system that takes into account markets structure works in every environment, be it ranging, surging or a bear market.

Learning price action TA takes time to learn though, it's a skill like when we learned to code till the time we got paid for it. And trading, in general, goes against how our brain works. Psychology is the great barrier to profitability once you have a strategy. It explains the high failure rate. it being a hard skill is why there's so few people doing it, But it's not because it needs a very high IQ or Rafa Nadal's strength of mind. Most people could get there, but it takes a lot of effort, and theres so much deception and scamming around it, it's easier to pretend it's impossible based on the amount of people that fail.

I'm a bit blunt because of this, but you have to remember that calling "SMA crossover" TA is like calling setting up the washer "programming" it and equating it with programming in a software developer sense. And both are available to a wide population! Guys, there's much more to TA than that (and similar super simple strategies that just rely on no or very simple market structure).

I just had to reply. Someone down there said he spent time and said no indicator will reliably predict price. Forget about magical indicators, agreed. I have proved TA to myself, but it doesn't look at all like what the article or many of the comments describe. It's one TA system of many, though.

I'm happy to answer questions if anyone disagreeing has any. I may not be able to do so for a broad variety of scenarios, since I'm talking specifically about day trading, but the "patterns" (it's not just patterns, it's patterns in a market structure context where you get the alpha from, otherwise I understand the "astrology" analogy presented here) apply to longer timeframes as well.

The opportunity is there for the average person to take, but it needs sufficient skill / training, like any other skill. I can't "prove it" to you, but I already proved it to myself and many people in the trading community did.

You don't need any sophisticated tools or huge amounts of money. It's bloody difficult though, not just for the technical reasons (there are many strategies but most go beyond a MA crossover, even though I'm not denying even that can produce alpha -- I don't know or care), but mostly for psychological reasons. And psychology is what's behind many of the patterns you see in the markets.

It had a 94% failure rate, but I got to pass on the first attempt because Gil's free lectures of his LA course made me intuitively understand the stuff we were being taught in that course, which was very dry and IMO poorly explained, at least for freshmen. Don't think I would have dodged the bullet otherwise.

Thanks Gil.

Apparently, it requires curl 7.81 to compile, but I'm on ubuntu 20 (7.6x) and wanted to do a quick try, so this patch makes it work (trivially) by removing the couple of new symbols depending on that newer version. Just a quick hack to compile.

   --- a/trurl.c
   +++ b/trurl.c
   @@ -362,11 +362,12 @@ static void get(struct option *op, CURLU *uh)
         case CURLUE_NO_PORT:
         case CURLUE_NO_QUERY:
         case CURLUE_NO_FRAGMENT:
   -            case CURLUE_NO_ZONEID:
   +            // would require 7.81
   +            // case CURLUE_NO_ZONEID:
           /\* silently ignore */
           break;
         default:
   -              fprintf(stderr, PROGNAME ": %s (%s)\n", curl_url_strerror(rc),
   +              fprintf(stderr, PROGNAME ": %s (%s)\n", rc,
            variables[i].name);
           break;
         }
   @@ -589,8 +590,8 @@ static void singleurl(struct option *o,
           CURLU_GUESS_SCHEME|CURLU_NON_SUPPORT_SCHEME);
          if(rc) {
     if(o->verify)
   -          errorf(ERROR_BADURL, "%s [%s]", curl_url_strerror(rc), url);
   -        warnf("%s [%s]", curl_url_strerror(rc), url);
   +          errorf(ERROR_BADURL, "%s [%s]", rc, url);
   +        warnf("%s [%s]", rc, url);
          }
          else {
     if(o->redirect)