(/s - Blargh, writing like that that by hand is exhausting)

> The brains are already almost devoid of the coordinated neural firing necessary even for minimal consciousness, says Brendan Parent, a bioethicist at New York University Langone Health and one of six ethicists on Bexorg’s advisory board. But the company also forestalls any electrical activity with the anesthetic propofol, among other measures.

'Russia running out of "single-use" soldiers; 'UK running low on fuel, truck drivers'; 'China's factories are wrestling with labor shortages'.

Are we supposed to feel bad that people aren't rushing to birth the next generation of cannon fodder, truck drivers, or work in factories for 60-70 hours a week? Are these roles that Morland would have his own children fill, or just other people's?

Genuinely bizarre choice of headlines to present a pro-natal argument with. Did he not read the actual book? Bad editor? AI slop?

Advertising aimed at the actually rich is usually more about saving time, "elevated" experiences, or building legacy.

Many designed things do not need to be differentiated and will benefit from a homogenous AI-powered design (internal documentation, local service business communications, etc) in the same way that desktop publishing replaced hand or type-written notes but did not replace professional designers (although it did require them to learn digital tooling).

For designs that do benefit from being differentiated it'll be interesting to see what happens. If anything, AI homogeneity provides more opportunity for talented human designers who can provide "design alpha" beyond whatever trends the LLMs sucked up in their last crawl.

I am glad to see I am not considered a public figure and aim to keep it that way.

I also had to go oddly far back to find a piece of long-form writing I had done that was truly mine and not tainted by an LLM edit pass which was a slightly disturbing realization.

Facebook I'm sure does not think they have a problem, as they make a ton of money from running these garbage ads with no consequences.

Same with running my local dev environment's docker containers, now they run on that workstation and my battery life is far higher, treating my portable device as a dumb terminal.

They are "OK enough" that it will be a matter of taste if they are acceptable or not at this point for you to use.

For coding they work fine for me, terminal tools work particularly well as I can bump the font size up. IDEs and web browsing aren't bad either, it's about the equivalent of a single 1080p screen. They are nicer than hunching over a laptop for travel use but I still prefer a proper monitor when available.

The optics are a generation or two from being where they need to be to market these as productivity devices, but if you like being an early adopter with all the quirks that come with it, they're fun.

How about now? https://apfel.franzai.com/ (iOS/MacOS, runs the 3B param model already bundled for Siri) https://github.com/alichherawalla/off-grid-mobile-ai (Android, runs ~7B models on flagship phones at 15-30tok/s)

Foundation model investment feels like the bubble around fiber optics circa 2001 - a great technology being pushed forward by a speculative mania as it seems like it'll be useful in some profitable way, but nobody's quite sure how.

The more disturbing implication is that it's not just "everything on the internet" is fake so much as the whole surrounding culture of consumerist societies - and that possibly every thought you have ever had and will have is a product of these influences.

Mark Fisher is a good read on whether we're even capable of comprehending what it would mean to live outside such a system at this point.

"Fewer than 2 in 10 teens can correctly distinguish between news, advertisement, opinion and entertainment" https://newslit.org/news-and-research/news-literacy-in-ameri...

"82 percent of middle school students couldn't tell the difference between sponsored articles and real news stories.

Out of the Stanford college students that were tested, more than 80 percent couldn't identify biased content from independent news sources supported by groups like lobbying firms as being less reliable than a mainstream news source." https://universe.byu.edu/2018/02/09/studies-show-lack-media-...

I hope it leads to interesting discoveries and more art to appreciate for you!

If you agree (or think that enough people will agree to increase the value of the stock), you can buy the shares. If you don't, you aren't forced to buy it - and as a penny stock with a market cap of $21MM, nobody's index fund or pension is going to be forced to buy it either.

The stock market sort of _is_ just karma farming - building belief in your company vision so that investors bring capital. Nearly all companies trade at a positive "P/E ratio" - that is, the price of a share is on average 10-20X higher than their current earnings - the difference representing pure belief that the company will earn more in the future.

The regulatory guardrails around it are not perfect, but striking the balance between allowing the public to participate in the growth of successful companies in a dynamic economy, and protecting them from scams, is a fine line. Being able to invest in publicly traded companies has made many middle class and working class people wealthy, the regulations do work for most people to keep them out of trouble while allowing them to participate. The people who get hurt are the ones who trade penny stocks like lottery tickets, which is less a regulatory failure and more the impulsive behavior that drives any kind of gambling.

This is more akin to a reverse merger than a SPAC (eg. Berkshire Hathaway being a failing textile mill and WPP being a wire basket company) except it is unusual to see it happen within an existing leadership team. They sold off all their IP so figured they might as well use the shell to try and cash in on AI hype, I guess.

That shift also reflected the era he lived in - one where visual arts played a central role in the cultural conversation - making him a true part of the zeitgeist that is hard to imagine now when visual art feels less central and more inward-looking.

A lot of what feels cliche now started with him, it only feels commonplace now as his influence was so massive.

Imagine being born in 1850 when everyone got around on horseback and paintings were realistic portrayals of people, landscapes, religious figures in muted tones. Impressionism (Van Gogh etc) arrives and is considered radical, then in 1907 you see _Les Demoiselles d'Avignon_ with its bright colors and abstract depiction of cavorting prostitutes. It would certainly provoke a reaction. The 20th Century had arrived.

Timely given I just tried to sign into Meta for the first time in a year or two as I am being required to work on a Marketing API integration, got prompted for a video selfie(!) and my account is now in "Community Review" as maybe my expression was too grumpy about being required to present myself for inspection. Abhorrent company.

For example:

A simple simulation of social networks rapidly reproduced three well-documented dysfunctions: partisan echo chambers, concentrated influence among a small elite, and amplification of polarized voices - creating a "social media prism" that distorts political discourse. Notably, all attempts at conscious intervention failed to help or made things worse. [1]

Rather than fostering closer relationships, the algorithms and structures underlying social media platforms inadvertently contribute to profound psychological harm - particularly among teenagers, who are disproportionately affected by curated online personas, peer pressure to present a perfect digital image, and constant notification bombardment. [2]

And from Meta's own internal UX research, surfaced in recent harm-related court filings: researchers described Instagram as functionally a drug, users as binging to the point of reward deficit, and the platform's role as that of a pusher. [3]

I've gradually opted out of social media over the last few years. That Meta internal research was the thing that finally pushed me to delete IG, the last social app I was still using. My life has been noticeably calmer and better adjusted since - which makes me skeptical that a better protocol, rather than a fundamentally different relationship with technology and socialization, is our way out of the current mess.

[1] https://arxiv.org/html/2508.03385v1 [2] https://scholar.dsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1222&con... [3] https://www.lieffcabraser.com/pdf/2025-11-21-Brief-dckt-2480... (p. 33)

https://www.clearview.ai/privacy-and-requests

I have suddenly becomes very interested in New York's S1422 Biometric Privacy Act.

The Pentagon spat is having a hell of a Streisand Effect on them; DAUs +180% (source: SimilarWeb), paid subs doubling. If past experience is any indicator, it'll settle down as they scale up (or they fall out of the news cycle). Google Trends search interest shows the story: https://trends.google.com/explore?q=claude%2Canthropic&date=...