<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: gbxbxbcbd</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=gbxbxbcbd</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2026 09:22:52 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=gbxbxbcbd" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by gbxbxbcbd in "Statichost.eu – European static site hosting"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I assume no storage limits but bandwidth limits</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2026 06:56:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49573841</link><dc:creator>gbxbxbcbd</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49573841</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49573841</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by gbxbxbcbd in "Statichost.eu – European static site hosting"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Significantly too expensive for most users. I understand that they target agencies, but most users would prefer less and pay by site instead of paying 120 EUR / year for unlimited sited<p>Also the traffic cost is ridiculously high. Even AWS (which is often criticized for their high traffic cost) does not bill traffic below 10 TB (20 times higher) and then cost 0.1 EUR / 10 GB (10 times lower)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2026 06:45:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49573767</link><dc:creator>gbxbxbcbd</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49573767</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49573767</guid></item></channel></rss>