<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: geordiew</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=geordiew</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 07:29:28 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=geordiew" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by geordiew in "Try to take my position: The best promotion advice I ever got"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I fear Maduro suggested this to Trump.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2026 05:00:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46508921</link><dc:creator>geordiew</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46508921</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46508921</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by geordiew in "The Arithmetic of Braids (2022)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>the problem with additive notation is that the braid group isn't commutative when number of strands is > 2.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2025 21:45:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46039755</link><dc:creator>geordiew</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46039755</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46039755</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by geordiew in "John Jumper: AI is revolutionizing scientific discovery [video]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think it is fair to say that any blowing-up solution of navier stokes would be of purely intellectual interest. NS is a problem that many smart people have thought about and failed to solve. The current picture is that there are probably self-similar blowing up solutions that exist at extremely high codimension in the space of initial conditions. Thus they are "probability zero", and, if essentially never arise in nature. (A nice analogy: imagine a movie of a stone falling into a pond, and the ripples created afterwards. Now run the movie of the ripples backwards. We never see this in nature!)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2025 09:36:58 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45423612</link><dc:creator>geordiew</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45423612</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45423612</guid></item></channel></rss>