Unless they encourage them daytime and deprecate them night time.

Sure, some imaginary perfect market would drop. This one is far from perfect, and it may drop by marginal percentages. It won't drop back to what it was before it went up 4x in price.

I would be very surprised if a market for older, superceded chips takes off, not because it isn't a brilliant idea, but because in order to use them, you have to make boards and systems which can consume them, and right now, the people who do that for a living are making a good living selling stuff as inputs to the people making a good living selling memory at inflated prices to the AI factories.

It's turtles all the way down.

Somehow the "you can afford to lose your entire stake, you aren't leveraged, this isn't a con you fell into" is missing.

(thats aside from "you aren't an inside trader with privileged knowledge because of family ties to the WH, are you")

I asked an Amazonian about this once, and they said the algo worked for them in sales, because enough people go to the "in the style of" or actually want that and so I am SOL.

You would think there could be a search setting "specific author name == author, no extras" or something, if they wanted to maximise utility and choice.

I step over the OAuth with email-oauth2-proxy.

There are X frontends to NMH like Sylpheed or claws. They make sense.

I was really pleased my decades long investment in @short.name paid off, and I have been able to keep a short @pobox.com instance, which I undoubtedly would lose in the migration into @fastmail.com

Aside from the vanity aspect, the distinction between a real mail provider and a stable forwarding service is a useful one. Thank you Bron (and others) for keeping things going.

"a lot" would be less rhetorically satisfying, but probably more appropriate.

I suspect the number is in fact, far less than 50%. In mining engineering, I'd be amazed if a significant majority of the rules don't stem from a significant accident or death, or forseeable need to avoid them. In medicine, the stakes are equally high. Building codes? It depends. The cost of tunnelling in NY isn't because of government compliance.

And hand-installing the algo code is a tiresome one time process with if-but-maybe (no, it is not as simple as clicking on and paying for the licence frobs on the MS Store)

The comment flows online about this are classic. "Apple did this to us all" against "Why should I buy s/w licences I don't need" (as if you don't have a tonne of licences in your soft and firmware as-is to a variety of people) against "This format isn't any better anyway" against "Isn't this just about the video streams" against "Is this what those motion video sequences are from Apple" (no, thats different, even if encoded in HEIC...

Guys, enough already. Just pay a one-time somewhere in Redmond, and put this logic back into an update so we can move on with our lives.

It has been pointed out to me when I say this that you cannot just switch a fab designed for VLSI gates in CPU into giant RAM making machines: The fabs all have their own peculiarities. They need to be tuned. Nothing is free, nothing is quick. The number of layers, the reagents, the specific dopands, they all vary. And contamination would be a real problem at this scale so purging a line made for process-A chemicals to become process-B must be quite an exercise too.

I believe current RAM and SSD stuff is very multi layered too. The older lines might just not "do" that amount of stacking.

(Not a VLSI engineer or a brain surgeon)

Is it about department of war using AI instead of people to decide things? Or Amazon's material losses in DC assets?

The same story is told about Eastman Kodak and 35/70mm film stock, as well as 16mm and 8mm with and without sound track.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gutmann-ssh-preauth/

I still don't see how a non invasive glucose level works tbh.

(Not a doctor or a medical scientist or an FDA)