Bonus points if you find yourself actually saying it out loud while typing it.

I have used the word "shenanigans" way more in a couple of years of agentic coding than in 30 years of writing code with humans.

Is this why airline routes look like they are "hopping" on a map?

When I was a kid, I thought this was meant to represent the Z axis (so until today)

(I guess saying "The Incredibles" would have been shorter, but it feels weird to credit them with this style)

We're quickly getting to a point where all parenting is delegated to people and institutions that have nothing to do with raising children.

And then we complain that our kids are not being raised properly. We don't even know who to blame for this any more.

That's never been a valid argument to dismiss criticism. It wasn't with Dreamweaver, any it wasn't with visual basic, and it isn't with Tailwind.

Patterns matter. Best practices matter. Path of least resistance matters. Those are all choices you make when you develop a CSS framework. Some of those choices are good and some are bad.

If none of those things mattered, them choosing a CSS framework would not matter at all.

Can tailwind be a useful CSS framework? Absolutely, but that can be said of any of them.

Which is precisely why it makes sense to point out it's unique flaws, so that people can make an informed decision as to what works best for them.

If you have some unique feature to tailwind that you think makes it better than the rest, you should share that.

Everything you have listed is also accomplished by all the other CSS frameworks, so it almost sounds like tailwind is simply the main one you have experience with.

Nobody was talking about how much better it is until you wrote this though

It's like you're building your own windmills brick by brick

This is one variable I almost always see in this discussion: the more strict the rules that you give the LLM, the more likely it is to deeply disappoint you

The earlier in the process you use it (ie: scaffolding) the more mileage you will get out of it

It's about accepting fallability and working with it, rather than trying to polish it away with care

Easiest Turing test ever...

For a shark lover, you should know that shark is not a species, but a taxonomy group.

From there, everything else you assume is incorrect (ie: some species of sharks have definitely gone extinct)

It's a kindergartners view on troubleshooting an unfathomably complex issue.

"Well just raise taxes and fix that!"

If I was currently hiring, not using AI would be the cheapest, fastest way to impress me.

I'm not kidding when I say that typos are not too far from becoming a sign of higher intelligence. Or at least better taste than most.

I'm surprised tunable intentional "human" mistakes are not a core feature of LLMs. Maybe it's actually hard for them?

I figured as much. I don't think it takes Sherlock Holmes to identify akshually types, but thanks for the compliment, I suppose.

> . “HP never exceeds max”

I think it's because its such a braindead thing to fix that when I see them, it's clear the "author" hasn't even read their own "work".

Like, you're not even trying to hide it at the laziest level possible. Blegh.

(See how you can tell a human wrote that?)