<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: ghusbands</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=ghusbands</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 18:41:59 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=ghusbands" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ghusbands in "Amateur armed with ChatGPT solves an Erdős problem"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Do you posit that there are enough examples of 30x8 ellipses encoded in braille online for ChatGPT to learn from but not 31x7 or 31x9 ellipses? That seems unlikely.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 11:44:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47909537</link><dc:creator>ghusbands</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47909537</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47909537</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ghusbands in "An update on recent Claude Code quality reports"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>They lost me a little before then - Claude Code's regressions were so very obvious and there's no sign they've learned their lesson in this article or in the comments of those who work on Claude Code on HN. They'll continue to tweak and generally mess around with a product people are using, altering the behaviour without notice in ways that can severely impact use, for months! GPT5.4 has been remarkably consistent and capable, as a replacement. I've cancelled my max plan.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 09:22:45 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47887727</link><dc:creator>ghusbands</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47887727</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47887727</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ghusbands in "MuJoCo – Advanced Physics Simulation"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>In the video in question, he doesn't seem able to choose a good scoring function for the stochastic solver (even over multiple weeks), seemingly choosing a linear sum of distances (see 8:50) between simulation and reality. That's a mistake that not even an undergraduate should make. He needs some domain experts.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 18:52:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47867700</link><dc:creator>ghusbands</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47867700</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47867700</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ghusbands in "A Python Interpreter Written in Python"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Partly, it's simply that words matter. An interpreter is not a compiler, even if partial evaluators and Futamura transforms are very cool. Posting about them in a context that isn't a confusion about what interpreters are may have been more fruitful.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 13:05:45 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47863005</link><dc:creator>ghusbands</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47863005</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47863005</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ghusbands in "A Python Interpreter Written in Python"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes, that's another great example of the same kind of thing - creating a JIT from an interpreter. It remains true that interpreters do not directly generate machine code.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 23:28:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47811710</link><dc:creator>ghusbands</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47811710</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47811710</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ghusbands in "A Python Interpreter Written in Python"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That's a partial evaluator, not an interpreter, and it converts an interpreter into compiler, which are different things.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 20:44:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47810381</link><dc:creator>ghusbands</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47810381</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47810381</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ghusbands in "A Python Interpreter Written in Python"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is still incorrect. A bytecode interpreter, as its name indicates, interprets a bytecode. Typically, compiling a bytecode to native machine code is the work of a JIT compiler.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 20:42:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47810356</link><dc:creator>ghusbands</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47810356</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47810356</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ghusbands in "Taking a Look at Compression Algorithms – Moncef Abboud"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It has DEFLATE code, Snappy code, LZ4 code, ZSTD exploration, and describes many involved sub-algorithms, with diagrams - what more were you wanting?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 14:04:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47806072</link><dc:creator>ghusbands</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47806072</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47806072</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ghusbands in "Servo is now available on crates.io"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I wonder why most of the "g" characters are cropped.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 07:38:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47762499</link><dc:creator>ghusbands</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47762499</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47762499</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ghusbands in "Creating the Futurescape for the Fifth Element (2019)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>True, but that’s using “effects” in a broader sense than people seem to mean here. The discussion seems to be about the visible effects the audience experiences as effects, and whether those age well, not invisible digital cleanup, compositing, or set extension.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 20:04:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47743849</link><dc:creator>ghusbands</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47743849</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47743849</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ghusbands in "Issue: Claude Code is unusable for complex engineering tasks with Feb updates"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Even with high effort, the adaptive thinking can just choose no thinking. See bcherny's post they were replying to: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47668520">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47668520</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 14:55:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47676400</link><dc:creator>ghusbands</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47676400</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47676400</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ghusbands in "A Recipe for Steganogravy"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Steganography is (hopefully invisibly) hiding information in an image, not creating an image that so obviously encodes information.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 18:14:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47630047</link><dc:creator>ghusbands</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47630047</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47630047</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ghusbands in "The future of version control"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>A common misconception is that git works with diffs as a primary representation of patches, and that's the implied reading of "stores diffs". Yes, git uses diffs as an optimisation for storage but the underlying model is always that of storing whole trees (DAGs of trees, even), so someone talking about it storing diffs is missing something fundamental. Even renames are rederived regularly and not stored as such.<p>However, context would matter and wasn't provided - without it, we're just guessing.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2026 16:09:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47491442</link><dc:creator>ghusbands</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47491442</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47491442</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ghusbands in "Zero-day CSS: CVE-2026-2441 exists in the wild"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes, once you use 'unsafe' to bypass the safety model, you don't get safety.<p>Edit: If you reply with a reply, rather than edits, you don't get such confusion.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2026 07:19:58 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47070892</link><dc:creator>ghusbands</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47070892</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47070892</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ghusbands in "The first new compass since 1936"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The comments on this site (HN) may be what most people are talking about. Youtube comments are too easily censored, so they probably will never manage to stick around.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2026 17:32:01 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46669930</link><dc:creator>ghusbands</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46669930</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46669930</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ghusbands in "OLED, Not for Me"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I would probably see text quality issues on that setup. It depends on how far away the monitor is. PPI on phone screens tends to be much higher than PPI on laptops which tends to be higher than PPI on monitors, because each is typically used at a different distance.<p>If you're not using text around 9 pixels tall, as in the article, you're probably going to be okay. On a 27 inch screen at a typical office screen distance, I'd probably want 6k, but 4k is pretty good and 1080p is terrible.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2026 16:22:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46567004</link><dc:creator>ghusbands</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46567004</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46567004</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ghusbands in "OLED, Not for Me"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>In my experience, it seems to. My astigmatism (or other eye stuff) seems to move different colours different amounts, leading to wider RGB pixels and making things like Cleartype so much worse. So people were enjoying Cleartype and I was hating the obvious colour-changes and fringes that somehow they weren't seeing. I assume some people are lucky enough to have aberrations that actually make cleartype more pleasant.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2026 16:04:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46566817</link><dc:creator>ghusbands</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46566817</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46566817</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ghusbands in "OLED, Not for Me"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's not like the Cleartype tuner actually does what the pages claim - you can go through and use the magnifier to choose the grayscale-only outcomes and still see Windows doing RGB stripe cleartype throughout. People literally have to install third-party tools like MacType or GDI-PlusPlus to get solid font rendering. So blaming users for using it wrong (especially when they're not even on Windows) is odd.<p>Also, many people can see and are bothered by particular non-rectangular pixel layouts - it doesn't require doing odd things.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2026 14:17:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46565908</link><dc:creator>ghusbands</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46565908</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46565908</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ghusbands in "Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold hands-on"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I had the same experience (Z Fold 4, screen protector at hinge broke at the five month mark - I replaced it with a third-party one to avoid a long repair period and another such breakage - the screen itself is now faulty at just beyond the two year mark).<p>If anyone were to buy a modern Samsung folding phone, I'd suggest you make sure you get the two-year coverage for the screen and assume it will break soon after that, so treat it like you're going to buy one every 2-3 years. But remember that warranty repairs sometimes involve sending the phone away for weeks, and Android's phone transfer story is still incomplete. That's merely my experience, of course.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2026 14:04:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46565815</link><dc:creator>ghusbands</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46565815</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46565815</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ghusbands in "The first new compass since 1936"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The inhibition of movement via eddy currents works best while the needle is moving fast, so you can still end up with smaller oscillations for a while - the apparent jump-cut to a stationary needle could be hiding that.<p>It's far easier to just use a compass with a needle brake - manually dampen the oscillation using the brake (and let go to ensure you aren't holding an incorrect reading) and you get a reading quickly.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2026 14:11:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46526535</link><dc:creator>ghusbands</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46526535</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46526535</guid></item></channel></rss>