<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: giov4</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=giov4</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 20:11:45 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=giov4" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by giov4 in "How to Build a Minimal ZFS NAS Without Synology, QNAP, TrueNAS (2024)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I understand and I agree from an experience point of view it felt very unstable on debian and proxmox that is debian based.<p>I wanted to share this experience too as a warning to users investing time and money and possibly hitting instabilities that can cause raid problems and data loss. Don't know why my comment got downvoted, if I knew about this I would have handled things differently.<p>I usually recovered the pool thanks to other disks being fine, but beside zfs being super cool in terms of features and flexibility at the beginning it actually felt unreliable and I would not suggest it neither!<p>as mentioned it is probably more stable on other families but I didnt experience that yet.<p>would freebsd be the most reliable? or which one would have the most reliable zfs module state?<p>do other solutions like unraid or truenas or similar use zfs the background?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 08:28:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48829178</link><dc:creator>giov4</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48829178</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48829178</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by giov4 in "How to Build a Minimal ZFS NAS Without Synology, QNAP, TrueNAS (2024)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I killed 2x 4tb Nvme drives on Pciexpress with ZFS raid1 under proxmox, got them replaced, tried again on both pci-express and usb adapter kept getting io problems there too with zfs, drive gets disconnected during scrub or high load, tried already kernel or power management options for pciexpress and usb without sucess, managed to reproduce with high load.<p>or proxmox ( especially community edition) is fucked or zfs is still unstable, surprisingly with different drives on different interfaces I obtained same results, didnt swap proxmox for clean os, that might being some changes since modules and options would be different i guess. ( drives firmware etc are fine and performing well when inspected with proprietary windows tools)<p>just search zfs nvme pcie or usb problema or disconnect and you see similar stability problem for different users in different cases (os, drives etc), but also unraid and others, maybe somewhere is rithe right combo of options/glitches but didnt find it yet</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 07:20:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48828664</link><dc:creator>giov4</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48828664</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48828664</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by giov4 in "Kernel Anti-Cheat Is an Overreach"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>yama? ptrace scope? namespaces? selinux? apparmor?<p>of course depends also on system defaults, but then why I cannot dump ssh-agent process from same user?<p>oh maybe that's also the reason why the move to the kernel level in general? or that's not necessary with different privileges and they could stay on user space without taking over kernel? (insert here philosoraptor meme pls)<p>again having low leve drivers from external corps that could ready anything anytime from my system and exfiltrate without me even knowing is even more scary than running a recent microsoft os! and should be avoided if possible!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 13:49:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48817838</link><dc:creator>giov4</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48817838</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48817838</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by giov4 in "Kernel Anti-Cheat Is an Overreach"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>yes but you are going off topic, the point is companies installing low level malware on any gamer's system to prevent cheaters and monitoring all of them as a consequence. And not that there are not enough laws against cheaters and against people tampering with a software or system, also tampering imho has always been the base for the rest of the reversing :)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 08:11:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48814948</link><dc:creator>giov4</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48814948</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48814948</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by giov4 in "Kernel anti-cheat is an overreach"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Uninstalled riot years ago, not playing games that dont run on linux with proton, problem solved and you should do the same.<p>Avoiding to play games that take over my system on a low-level is a no go, I can live without LoL or BF6 and I live even better :)<p>ignoring this problems means you don't care about your identity, data, privacy and you prefer to keep ignoring this and play the games that hype abd you like, but inside you know that long term your are profiled and such profiling will be used against you!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 07:55:00 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48814864</link><dc:creator>giov4</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48814864</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48814864</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by giov4 in "Beyond All Reason (Free Total Annihilation Inspired RTS)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>what do you mean? rage quitting within minutes its pretty meaningless and games are often won nevertheless! also I tend to avoid rage quitters exactly for this reason and always play till the end, beside the learning the game is often won anyway, because loosing 1 front due to initial spam does not always represents real advantage.<p>is your statement related to BAR? what was your experience there? or we can assume its a low value general assumption as it looks like?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 19:43:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48635053</link><dc:creator>giov4</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48635053</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48635053</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by giov4 in "Beyond All Reason (Free Total Annihilation Inspired RTS)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Playing RTS since long time, TA to SupCom to FaF, I need to say that I totally understand your condition, especially considering my own experience and evolution on BAR.<p>I've seen lot of new or learning players being disoriented from the start, trolled and attacked during games, even kickbanned because of their sub-optimal playing after being FORCED to play front because of rating and placing/slot login in BAR.<p>While personally having a strong RTS background and even very specific to TA and FaF (basically BAR) I had to went through the same high toxicity problems.<p>The solution has been to don't give up, self learn through pain and few friends tips all the gaming micro details expected by other players and hidden in pro player knowledge.<p>IMHO this happened mainly and simply due to the lack of a well structured and established learning path for new players, that instead of opening a lobby list and joining the heat to get instantly rammed by toxicity should have the possibility to obtain basic game positioning, build and control knowledge in an more appropriate and structured way, in game info guidance on start -> tutorial?<p>Regarding the point of the poor newbie have to go as front player and holding while the pros stay in the back, is still kinda normal since the back positions, as especially the tech ones, are more fundamental later in the game, meaning that having a newbie there would be much worse game wise. and dont forget this is valid only for skill draft mode, there are othe draft modes too, even if the skill one is used "99%" of the time.<p>I find totally off topic and even offensive talking about needing to have had hard skin to go through this toxicity, or referencing completely different game types and generalizing on community and human interaction problems.
 Again, a new player should have an "onboarding" path easily available and providing necessary basic logic to be able to start decently. And based on long and wide experience this seems to be mainly a BAR problem!<p>While I always heavily appreciate the effort behind such types of games/communities and respect it a lot (due to having done similarly in other game cases) I keep playing, learning and evolving with BAR because I miss TA and FaF BUT I often receive stress and leave after a series of bad toxic matches with "bad back taste" and this is sad for any game and community, abd should be reduced as much as possibly.<p>Sadly I also need to underline that I've personally seen unprofessional and sometimes also abusive or corrupt moderation from staff members, including abusive lobbies or manipulation behind player bans. Hence asking for player reports here doesn't seem decent neither, and a more legit and rock solid moderation could also help in compensating this type of issues.<p>And the last sad cherry (being an OSS enthusiast) is about having heard about strange forks and attribution from past work that leads now to publishers and money being involved, sad feeling but details would be needed before confirming any judgement.<p>I play it, I like it (because of TA and SupremeCommander Forged Alliance) but still (with all due respect for all the members behind and their effort) I often leave with a bitter or fishy back taste leftover by a generally hostile setup and community.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2026 22:09:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48623120</link><dc:creator>giov4</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48623120</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48623120</guid></item></channel></rss>