The intent of this control is absolutely not to require a whitelist of individual websites.

This control is meant to apply to ports and protocols aka tighten up and document your firewall rules

If you are referring to SI.L2-3.14.7, you also do not need to whitelist websites. A pDNS service helps here but is not required. There are free options available, one of which is offered to small businesses in the DIB through the NSA's CCC program. This also gets you vulnerability scanning and some other stuff, all free.

Let me know if you have any questions. CMMC isnt a cakewalk but it needs to be done right if you don't want to fail your $40k C3PAO assessment :)

1-2 over par is shooting 90-100 which is much more achievable :)

endofworld.swf

The joke on 4chins actually is that the Jannies do it for free. Never cared to fact check it, but it is a popular saying.

Also sage in all fields

I understand that there was a lawsuit and all that, I read through part of the Adobe thread from the other day. I am not defending Adobe in that regard.

If you only want the software for 2-3 months, the month-to-month agreement is available, but if you have a longer-term need for the software you get a discount for committing to a year's worth. If you take the discount, pay the cheaper monthly cost and then cancel before the end of the commitment, a penalty seems fair.

Again I am not defending whatever obfuscation of terms that led to the oft-mentioned lawsuit, just that there seems to be some confusion about monthly and annual commitments.

Thank you for bringing this up

If anything maybe you'd have a point if you said they should open up the specs of the mount and lens/body communication, but the RAW format really just has near-zero impact in the real world

I started buying the EF mount superfast primes because they're affordable now, but the 7D (more likely it was me) couldn't get the focus just right with such a shallow DOF

The R6 just doesn't miss. Low light/high ISO image quality is also MILES better.

Cameras are not in a death spiral. Artistically speaking, phones can't do what even a low end slr/mirrorless can do, its just that phones are good enough for the low-effort content 95% of people are interested in producing. Standalone cameras are inconvenient, bulky and require some level of artistic intention.

>Does any know how much volume there would be if cameras could be used in manufacturing processes for machine vision, on robots / drones, in self-driving cars, on building for security, as webcams for video conferencing, for remote education, and everywhere else imaging is exploding?

I don't know about the manufacturing or drone stuff, but for video conferencing and remote education, the point of the video really isn't image quality or "art" but just good enough picture to not get in the way of the real purpose of the interaction, so a whole camera kit is just added complexity/annoyance for no benefit.

IMO

If you go into the wilderness where axe throwing is allowed, and you maim or kill someone, you are personally liable to be sued or prosecuted.

If you throw an axe where it is not allowed, you are also personally liable criminally and civilly.

Unless you have a specific claim and source for your claim?

Off-topic but their botanical gardens and Cactus/Desert garden is a really enjoyable afternoon.

the EU regulations made it harder/less attractive to host a small local forum and I think that was his point