<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: gobdovan</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=gobdovan</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 16:08:33 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=gobdovan" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by gobdovan in "Will you have spent more of your life with computers than your family?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>"Can you stack your family?" - Michael Falk, The Onion</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 20:28:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49337159</link><dc:creator>gobdovan</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49337159</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49337159</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by gobdovan in "Kelly Criterion Simulator"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Dynamic programming. Although if you don't know the distribution of how the bets will look beforehand, there's no real optimal strategy. Think you see first bet has 99% chance of giving you x2. Do you bet everything and take it? It could either be the worst bet of the 20 bets, in which case you just took 1% chance to lose everything unnecessarily, or it could have been the single bet that would be winning money, in which case betting it all would be the only strategy that could win.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 02:14:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49163681</link><dc:creator>gobdovan</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49163681</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49163681</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by gobdovan in "The Growing Compute Shortage"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>We're in such a bull market, even shortages grow.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 12:10:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48991204</link><dc:creator>gobdovan</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48991204</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48991204</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by gobdovan in "Sleep regularity is a stronger predictor of mortality risk than sleep duration (2023)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'd refine it as 'If feasible, try fixing your diet before going for pills'. The body is adapted to function within a healthy nutritional range. If your diet falls outside that range, it's expected that your body won't function properly. If problems persist despite a good diet, then pills become a more reasonable option.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 14:27:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48921377</link><dc:creator>gobdovan</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48921377</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48921377</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by gobdovan in "Precursor"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Humans are very inefficient when it comes to navigating the web, but also take actions pretty fast when completing forms. You don't really need advanced ML to see bots spend two seconds to read a full page, then spend 10 seconds just to click two buttons a human would click together in under 2 seconds. The amount of sophistication in bot detection peaks at about 'if user searches 20 queries in less than 5 minutes on our search engine and uses incognito, CAPTCHA them'.<p>Because of this, perfectly mimicking humans is not a good goal for a bot (as it is the case for AI in music), because they would become very inefficient, at least latency wise (throughput could be engineered around by scraping many unrelated webpages in parallel).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 19:15:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48897389</link><dc:creator>gobdovan</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48897389</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48897389</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by gobdovan in "Apple's new SpeechAnalyzer API, benchmarked against Whisper and its predecessor"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You can't reasonably expect generic ASR to infer tmux from "tee-mucks". "tee-em-you-ex" works reliably if you're ok with capitalisation for your use case.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 17:46:00 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48896186</link><dc:creator>gobdovan</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48896186</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48896186</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by gobdovan in "David Beazley – Programming Courses"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>How is anyone making money from courses if dabeaz isn't? He's got the word of mouth going on, celebrity status in the Python world, world-class courses, it doesn't make sense to me. I'm not asking rhetorically, am truly curious about what's going on.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2026 08:55:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48792462</link><dc:creator>gobdovan</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48792462</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48792462</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by gobdovan in "If you're a button, you have one job"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>When on Speaker/hands-free mode, it just closes screen. They assume you wouldn't press lock button while against your ear, because it closes the screen automatically. The problem is that there's some bugs that keep the screen open sometimes, or you may use it in a quiet room as if it were on hands-free.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2026 08:42:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48792392</link><dc:creator>gobdovan</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48792392</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48792392</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by gobdovan in "Reality has a surprising amount of detail (2017)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Markets and evolution are both knowledge processes. I think you would enjoy Donald Campbell's essay on evolutionary epistemology from 'The Philosophy of Karl Popper'.<p>Parent's comment is observing a prerequisite to markets, humans are the only animal with global markets and biological selection happened to produce the kind of creature that can stabilise around markets.<p>It's also selection that produced the current form of markets themselves. The world could have been otherwise; our current markets are contingent selection products, not analytically necessary institutions, and not guaranteed to be the uniquely best mechanisms for producing abstractions and tools.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 18:52:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48778564</link><dc:creator>gobdovan</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48778564</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48778564</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by gobdovan in "Reality has a surprising amount of detail (2017)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Were 8 billion people all working toward more detail? Isn't civilization also the process by which detail is pruned, compressed and made into abstractions small enough for one mind to use?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 18:09:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48778006</link><dc:creator>gobdovan</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48778006</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48778006</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by gobdovan in "Reality has a surprising amount of detail (2017)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I usually view it the opposite way from the article's perspective. There's surprisingly little detail we rely on, yet things work out somehow.<p>There's the Popper observation that any model of reality has zero chance to be true, since our models are finite, yet we're trying to describe a fractal reality. It's amazing how few levels of decomposition we need to go through to get something useful, like the stairs in the article (3 decomposition steps, as compared to thousands). If I were to never interact with reality and rely on pure reason alone, I would expect nothing humans ever do to work.<p>Abstraction and exploration are unreasonably effective.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 09:58:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48773121</link><dc:creator>gobdovan</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48773121</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48773121</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by gobdovan in "Most arguments are about ego, not ideas"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Was discussing the content, not the author. Yes, I am challenging vague discourse about echo chambers, since the mechanism behind an echo chamber is selectively listening to some opinions, while dismissing other sources of authority or correction. To see why this is a problem, consider that parent comment is compatible with both:<p>"Flat Earth is a cancerous echo chamber"<p>"As I grew older and became better at arguing, I learned to explain why universities teaching that the Earth is spherical are cancerous ideological echo chambers."</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 03:28:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48756172</link><dc:creator>gobdovan</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48756172</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48756172</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by gobdovan in "Most arguments are about ego, not ideas"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> isolating themselves & having their [...] views spread far and wide<p>> most cancerous developments & the less contentious it becomes<p>Your comment complains that people cannot articulate their reasons, while making a sweeping, emotionally loaded claim whose reasons are themselves barely articulated.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 14:48:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48747753</link><dc:creator>gobdovan</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48747753</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48747753</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by gobdovan in "Kb – Prolog Knowledge Base"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Relational algebra, EAV model, MVCC, Nix and a few principles around removing data only if you can prove it's reconstructible some other way.<p>My email's on my profile.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 23:17:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48740496</link><dc:creator>gobdovan</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48740496</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48740496</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by gobdovan in "Kb – Prolog Knowledge Base"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'm developing a similar project, I also added scripts to it so it works like an hermetic/replayable system too. Do you use yours for anything cool? Maybe a truth maintenance system of sorts? Do the queries get unwieldy at some point?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 00:23:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48727076</link><dc:creator>gobdovan</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48727076</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48727076</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by gobdovan in "On cigarettes"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I heard people with dogs claiming similar effects.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 00:45:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48713432</link><dc:creator>gobdovan</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48713432</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48713432</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by gobdovan in "On cigarettes"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'd like to imagine that the creator heard the 'Einstein zebra puzzle' (the puzzle about different nationalities having different pets and smoking different brands of cigarettes) and just made the pets have different nationalities and smoking the cigarettes directly.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 00:42:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48713416</link><dc:creator>gobdovan</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48713416</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48713416</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by gobdovan in "Stealing Is a Skill"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Actual stealing is an even more impressive skill. Usually involves intensively trained sleight of hand, elaborate ruses, a very good understanding of theory of mind regarding the victim's attention, and planned deescalation paths in case you're caught.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 15:15:00 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48661236</link><dc:creator>gobdovan</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48661236</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48661236</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by gobdovan in "My Mathematical Regression"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is a pre-AI phenomena. I observe it quite a lot with stuff I did in high school but usually with complex problems. What's generally happening is that you were working with pen and paper through a hard problem. With adult brain, you'd expect just to know the answers, but in reality you're not much smarter than you were at 14, so you need to do the thing properly.<p>Also if you help little kids with homework, you'll see that some problems are quite difficult as well and require you to actually think, even if it's problems for 10 year olds.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 20:39:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48635835</link><dc:creator>gobdovan</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48635835</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48635835</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by gobdovan in "My Mathematical Regression"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You can go down or right at any point. To go in bottom-right corner, you need n down steps and n right steps. In how many ways can you arrange n things on type A and n things of type B? In C(2n, n). The problem is about modeling, once you model it correctly, you get the definition of combinations.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 20:35:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48635787</link><dc:creator>gobdovan</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48635787</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48635787</guid></item></channel></rss>