<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: gokulravi992</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=gokulravi992</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2026 10:38:09 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=gokulravi992" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by gokulravi992 in "GitLab Security Incident: Attempted Exploitation of CVE-2026-97229"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The argument I'd make isn't about UI or features, it's about who owns security afterwards. The vendor has people whose whole job is patching things like this Ruby regex issue. The internal vibe-coded Jira usually has nobody, and the bugs that bite are boring ones, like a project page that loads for anyone who guesses the ID.<p>If they go ahead anyway, the ask is just that someone actually owns it after launch, not only builds it.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2026 05:57:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50285024</link><dc:creator>gokulravi992</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50285024</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50285024</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by gokulravi992 in "Self-Hosting has 34× First-Year ROI at 90% capacity"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>how?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 04:48:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49093520</link><dc:creator>gokulravi992</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49093520</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49093520</guid></item></channel></rss>