<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: goosejuice</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=goosejuice</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 11:10:03 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=goosejuice" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by goosejuice in "Git commands I run before reading any code"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>With respect, this is a myopic view. Not all software is an "app" or a monolith. If you use a terminal, you are directly using many utilities that by this metric are considered dying or dead.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 15:59:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47692011</link><dc:creator>goosejuice</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47692011</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47692011</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by goosejuice in "Git commands I run before reading any code"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yeah, this one demonstrates a particularly pernicious view of software development. One where growth, no matter how artificial, is the only sign of success.<p>If you work with service oriented software, the projects that are "dying" may very well be the most successful if it's a key component. Even from a business perspective having to write less code can also be a sign of success.<p>I don't know why this was overlooked when the churn metric is right there.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 15:44:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47691783</link><dc:creator>goosejuice</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47691783</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47691783</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by goosejuice in "Git commands I run before reading any code"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Forcing a single commit per PR is the issue imo. It's a lazy solution. Rebase locally into sensible commits that work independently and push with lease. Reviewers can reset to remote if needed.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 15:34:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47691651</link><dc:creator>goosejuice</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47691651</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47691651</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by goosejuice in "Tell HN: Anthropic no longer allowing Claude Code subscriptions to use OpenClaw"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>And the point being made is that can be done using only Anthropic provided tools.  Ask claude to set up crontab for you and be proactive. It will happily do so. This spring/summer you'll find all the same stuff they OpenClaw has in a Claude product. Most of it is already there just not packed neatly for a non technical user.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 20:21:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47642958</link><dc:creator>goosejuice</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47642958</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47642958</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by goosejuice in "Tell HN: Anthropic no longer allowing Claude Code subscriptions to use OpenClaw"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>They lowered limits opaquely before this. They "announced it"  in a twitter by a tech lead. This time it was in an email on a Friday to only some customers.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 20:16:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47642927</link><dc:creator>goosejuice</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47642927</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47642927</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by goosejuice in "Tell HN: Anthropic no longer allowing Claude Code subscriptions to use OpenClaw"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes, it's an unsurprising strategic choice. It's just sloppy PR that places the blame on OpenClaw somehow being irresponsible, when the actual rationale has little to do with that.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 20:14:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47642906</link><dc:creator>goosejuice</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47642906</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47642906</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by goosejuice in "Tell HN: Anthropic no longer allowing Claude Code subscriptions to use OpenClaw"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>What are they going to ban you for? Using their products? If Anthropic didn't want you to use their LLMs around the clock they wouldn't publish the features on their consumer app to do just that.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 20:08:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47642863</link><dc:creator>goosejuice</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47642863</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47642863</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by goosejuice in "Tell HN: Anthropic no longer allowing Claude Code subscriptions to use OpenClaw"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'm not sure what point you're trying to make. `claude remote` on a secure vm is basically all you need to operate a factory from your phone. I suspect a lot of people with your line of reasoning are stuck on human in the loop while awake level of AI use. Anthropic has no interest in that long term and all of their product moves validate that.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 20:04:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47642824</link><dc:creator>goosejuice</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47642824</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47642824</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by goosejuice in "Tell HN: Anthropic no longer allowing Claude Code subscriptions to use OpenClaw"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Anthropic wants power users, that's specifically their game, they just don't want those users using a harness they don't control.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 20:00:01 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47642773</link><dc:creator>goosejuice</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47642773</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47642773</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by goosejuice in "Tell HN: Anthropic no longer allowing Claude Code subscriptions to use OpenClaw"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>What am I misunderstanding?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 15:27:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47639857</link><dc:creator>goosejuice</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47639857</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47639857</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by goosejuice in "Tell HN: Anthropic no longer allowing Claude Code subscriptions to use OpenClaw"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's not nefarious it's just bad PR cover. They definitely don't have enough compute.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 15:22:46 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47639812</link><dc:creator>goosejuice</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47639812</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47639812</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by goosejuice in "Tell HN: Anthropic no longer allowing Claude Code subscriptions to use OpenClaw"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> I’m pretty happy knowing that it supports my development workflow for a week<p>For many it doesn't. It's opaque, it changes, and they bury the news in fucking twitter. <a href="https://x.com/trq212/status/2037254607001559305" rel="nofollow">https://x.com/trq212/status/2037254607001559305</a><p>There's a lot to love about Anthropic. But man do they suck at PR.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 06:29:46 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47636429</link><dc:creator>goosejuice</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47636429</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47636429</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by goosejuice in "Tell HN: Anthropic no longer allowing Claude Code subscriptions to use OpenClaw"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p><a href="https://martinfowler.com/articles/harness-engineering.html" rel="nofollow">https://martinfowler.com/articles/harness-engineering.html</a> it's being talked about everywhere.<p>If you manage developers or product folk, do you allow them to work when you're not looking over their shoulder? All developers can be managers/team leads now. You plan, you delegate, you review.<p>You're welcome to not do this, surely that's appropriate in quite a few areas of work, but many of us are because we can get more work done than if we we're micromanaging every line of code change. For startups, where a bit of quality can suffer in favor of finding market fit, this is huge.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 06:19:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47636372</link><dc:creator>goosejuice</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47636372</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47636372</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by goosejuice in "Tell HN: Anthropic no longer allowing Claude Code subscriptions to use OpenClaw"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I agree, I think consumers appreciate transparency.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 05:14:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47636010</link><dc:creator>goosejuice</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47636010</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47636010</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by goosejuice in "Tell HN: Anthropic no longer allowing Claude Code subscriptions to use OpenClaw"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> What's wrong with that?<p>Nothing beyond fumbling the PR around it.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 05:08:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47635973</link><dc:creator>goosejuice</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47635973</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47635973</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by goosejuice in "Tell HN: Anthropic no longer allowing Claude Code subscriptions to use OpenClaw"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It would be like some people sending the gym's competitor's android to the gym instead of the android the gym provides. Said gym also doesn't have enough equipment for everyone's gym appointed android despite being more expensive. Said gym doesn't want to admit this, nor does it want to raise prices on an already more expensive subscription. Said gym doesn't want competitor's android to gain marketshare. Said gym blames competitor's android for using up gym equipment despite gym's own android being capable of using as much equipment.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 04:55:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47635901</link><dc:creator>goosejuice</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47635901</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47635901</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by goosejuice in "Tell HN: Anthropic no longer allowing Claude Code subscriptions to use OpenClaw"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Definitely. They will see less usage. That's good for them because they have infra scaling issues that they don't care to admit explicitly. Their competitor will also get less telemetry (if they enable it). It's a win win.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 03:55:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47635552</link><dc:creator>goosejuice</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47635552</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47635552</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by goosejuice in "Tell HN: Anthropic no longer allowing Claude Code subscriptions to use OpenClaw"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Claude code is still getting used by these agents. They banned the mimicry awhile ago and said claude -p was fine.<p>OpenClaw just happens to also get telemetry, of probably higher value, out of the same tokens. It also happens to be owned by their competitor.<p>edit: I'm wrong OpenClaw surprisingly doesn't collect telemetry. Good for them.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 03:43:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47635475</link><dc:creator>goosejuice</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47635475</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47635475</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by goosejuice in "Tell HN: Anthropic no longer allowing Claude Code subscriptions to use OpenClaw"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Claude code has /loop. Claude app has scheduled tasks. The leaked source has a proactive mode.<p>I'm sorry but this framing just doesnt make sense.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 03:31:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47635406</link><dc:creator>goosejuice</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47635406</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47635406</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by goosejuice in "Tell HN: Anthropic no longer allowing Claude Code subscriptions to use OpenClaw"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes, mostly what I'm saying, but forgetting the important part:<p>From the email:
> but these tools put an outsized strain on our systems. Capacity is a resource we manage carefully and we need to prioritize our customers using our core products<p>OpenClaw doesn't put an outsized strain on their systems any more than Anthropics own tools. They just happen to have more demand than they can serve and they benefit more when people to use their own tools. They just aren't saying that explicitly.<p>It has nothing to do with fairness or being nice.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 03:25:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47635378</link><dc:creator>goosejuice</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47635378</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47635378</guid></item></channel></rss>