<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: goyozi</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=goyozi</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 15:20:45 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=goyozi" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by goyozi in "Rewrite Bun in Rust has been merged"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I don’t think you’re too cautious. Big upgrades and rewrites is somewhat of a „work hobby” of mine and this seems waaay too fast. I don’t know how the Bun canary process works and I guess their test suite is better than typical projects but still… I can’t imagine this working out well without testing it on a variety of big projects for a significant amount of time.<p>There’s probably loads(?) of observable behaviors that people rely on, consciously or not. Even _if_ the new thing is 100% spec compliant, it might still be breaking or otherwise problematic for heavy users.<p>That said, I’d love to be proven wrong. I use Bun from time to time on small stuff and I enjoy it, so I wish them well (:</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 10:22:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48133403</link><dc:creator>goyozi</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48133403</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48133403</guid></item></channel></rss>