I think the message the team lead takes away right now is "oh, this can be done a lot faster, let's do more!" This is exciting for a bit, but I think it comes at the cost of learning -- and being able to communicate --architectural lessons that would stage off systemic issues later.

The wealthy/owner class once again consume all of us -- here through AI -- because we cannot agree to work together.

People -- WANT -- this technology on their home devices and (apparently?) the providers of this tech don't seem to be running a profit so they probably don't want the maintenance tail on their side either.

I think it's a bit different. Inevitable that this becomes a household-run thing? Not likely.

Presumably it's a simple matter to send something back to a server, but I've really never thought about the mechanisms involved.

And the details involved in closing some of the rest of that loop do not seem THAT complicated.

Because my own introduction was through combinatorial game theory, I always get excited to see some hackenbush diagrams and rarely do when the subject is mentioned.

And... Then I remember it's rage bait.

Better to just read a book.

Avoiding tax through various loopholes that Capital gets a seat at the table to help craft, while benefitting from externalizing the costs to taxing labor is just corruption.

IEE754 does a good job explaining the representation, but it doesn't define all the operations and possible error codes as near as I can tell.

Is it just assumed "closest representable number to the real value" always?

What about all the various error codes?

It's one thing of we're talking food production and housing. Completely different if we're talking McDonald's happy meal toys.

Like, does the same argument apply to noise pollution? Are we alright installing a factory next to the symphony hall so long as the factory "owns" their land?

I think as our technology and understanding of the world grows we ought to change with it.

For me: I decided I could just slow down a bit. Standing out isn't worth the stress. I don't want to slack, but I don't feel compelled to cram productivity into every moment.

A few years in and I feel "back on my feet", but it was harder for being older.

"Assembly Theory" is a sort of applying (kolmogorov-esque) complexity theory to physics and other natural sciences. I don't know much else beyond that it's a "real thing".

So with that extra background, I give it a pass. I think it's an interesting idea at least.

Morality isn't a consideration.

The system must be understandable or people wouldn't incorporate and collaborate on extracting an edge. Slack in the system represents a lower price point, which will be corrected by a corresponding purchase order.

An individual has an effect, but it's miniscule compared to the massive forces in play. Unless you have a TRULY novel analysis of a situation, you are going to have a very low probability, success rate and out competing the market.

My understanding is the notion is about getting an application to "work" without any underlying theory of operation or evaluation of the imported context.