Some people then add layers of fetishizing to that, because humans gonna human, but the actual idea itself doesn’t deserve to be tarred with the same brush.

Your comment is below the intellectual and interpersonal standard that makes HN a good place to be.

I don’t doubt your sincerity and I can abide your opinion, but you should be restrained in ascribing such points of view to others.

I don’t know whether this tool enables that, but the idea is in the neighbourhood of “make it look scanned”.

Of course, it was great to have exactly the features I want, and I enjoyed learning some new things.

The last sentence of your comment sounds quite condescending.

Garages in duplexes typically are not big enough to fit an average car comfortably.

Knock down three adjacent homes and you can get maybe 6-8 levels, which would be no more than 40 families.

I want to know why you are keen to become an Australian citizen if you’re not enthusiastic about contributing your share.

Constructive discussion about appropriate levels of taxation is important, but let’s at least agree that the things we rely on (roads, hospitals, schools, defence, …) cost something.

I wonder how it truly factors into productivity, though. How is productivity measured, and does that measurement capture what is true?

You mention automated car washes as a baseline. I never used those in the past because I figured they’d be rubbish or would scratch the car or whatever. So I’d occasionally wash the car myself, and that’s it. Now that we have manual car washes available, I use them from time to time. They clearly (I assert) do a better job than anything automated. And they do it inside and out.

So I find the comparison interesting, but in need of elaboration.

(Every second day is fine, and better for their skin.)

Switching between sessions with fuzzy finding, and creating new ones when needed, is a wonderful feature.