<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: gslaller</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=gslaller</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 08:58:54 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=gslaller" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by gslaller in "Show HN: Gemini Pro 3 imagines the HN front page 10 years from now"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Just did the same with claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929<p><a href="https://2035.future-hackernews.workers.dev/news" rel="nofollow">https://2035.future-hackernews.workers.dev/news</a><p>The page looks much more consistent to the original. Only produced the html as output and the thinking in the comment of the html.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2025 18:58:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46209011</link><dc:creator>gslaller</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46209011</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46209011</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by gslaller in "Gemma 3 Technical Report [pdf]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>A noob speaking here. Why aren't there efforts to have a memory bank like structure where you attend to a sub set of codes depending on the key(at the attention level)? is this already done with the global attention mechanism (what is it even)?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2025 01:02:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43349369</link><dc:creator>gslaller</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43349369</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43349369</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by gslaller in "Predicting the future of distributed systems"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Having superficial knowledge about data storage/DBMS, perhaps I am just spewing nonsense. But I always imagine that a compaction layer for the long-tail/old data should be a standard, where less accessed(sometimes once a month) is pushed to a s3(but still queryable) like storage.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2024 10:33:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41399419</link><dc:creator>gslaller</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41399419</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41399419</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by gslaller in "Orange Meets: a demo application built using Cloudflare Calls"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Thanks for your contribution and maintaining the pion library(I am a user). The thing is that WebRTC usually isn't a complete solution, many don't want to have p2p but a p2s2p(which usually means distributed computing/SFU) solution, which makes developing an application way too complex.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2024 10:39:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39989161</link><dc:creator>gslaller</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39989161</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39989161</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by gslaller in "Go(lang): Robust generic functions on slices"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> func Index[S ~[]E, E comparable](s S, v E) int {<p>After seeing this signature, I think that Go is giving up on it's simpleness principle.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2024 09:47:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39490394</link><dc:creator>gslaller</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39490394</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39490394</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by gslaller in "Webvan: The dotcom bubble’s biggest bust"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Still a good idea overall, perhaps they did a silly execution and had made efficiencies error which a team wouldn't do now a day(listed some in these comments). They somehow went for growth-at-all-cost instead of increasing their density to check the unit economics of a single location and then move on with the gained knowledge.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2023 09:25:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37131840</link><dc:creator>gslaller</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37131840</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37131840</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by gslaller in "Apple Vision Pro: Apple’s first spatial computer"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Disney did a better job of demonstrating the Vision Pro's ability than apple. This is obviously going to be a hit, and by gen 3 - 4(with a ton a immersive apps) it might by trailing behind iPhone.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2023 19:58:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36202655</link><dc:creator>gslaller</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36202655</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36202655</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by gslaller in "Could we make the web more immersive using a simple optical illusion?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Why not use a tensorflowjs pose estimation model? They mention MediaPipe Iris but didn't find any tensorflowjs model??
<a href="https://storage.googleapis.com/tfjs-models/demos/posenet/camera.html" rel="nofollow">https://storage.googleapis.com/tfjs-models/demos/posenet/cam...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2023 11:06:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35020011</link><dc:creator>gslaller</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35020011</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35020011</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by gslaller in "Edtech, it's failure or yet missing success"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Is the value of accreditation that high, making it an USP? i.e. should an edtech go after the universities and school as a source of certification or more after the engagement of their user on their platform? I prefer the latter.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2023 10:47:33 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34663755</link><dc:creator>gslaller</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34663755</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34663755</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by gslaller in "Edtech, it's failure or yet missing success"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The content is certainly more interactive, but the interaction among users is still not given and the production also requires more resources to produce(I presume). Can hardly see that this kind of service will become the future of edtech.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2023 09:05:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34663209</link><dc:creator>gslaller</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34663209</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34663209</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Edtech, it's failure or yet missing success]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Arguably, YouTube (YT) is the best education technology platform on the internet, yet it is just a non-creative successor of the VHS/TV and not even CD(which had the menu, breaking the linearity of the frames). The bits are transmitted over switches and routers instead of a cartridge with a magnetic tape, improving the latency for the end-user and YT also has the recommendation system which is usually a hit-or-miss. YT has definitely the largest educational content to offer, though it can be difficult to find or even search for it. And it's lacks interactivity, has the comment system of 1990s. Khan Academy overcomes some of YT's deficits, but adds too much friction to the user interface and user experience and is a one-man show. Is there any innovation happening in this field, and what is your opinion on the future of this education technology?</p>
<hr>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34653740">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34653740</a></p>
<p>Points: 5</p>
<p># Comments: 4</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2023 11:50:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34653740</link><dc:creator>gslaller</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34653740</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34653740</guid></item></channel></rss>