https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cwy7vrd8k4eo

This mass surveillance proposal is so dystopian and broken, I’m genuinely ashamed to be an EU citizen.

Something does not add up. The conclusion just states "...downgrade from LLama 3.3 in every respect" without further explanation.

IMO, the title is quite accurate and supported by the content of the article. The team is prioritizing AI research at the expense of short term profit.

If the title was "DeepSeek is solely a research effort" you would have a case.

The AI race is super close and interesting at the moment in my opinion.

The Aider Polyglot website also states that the benchmark " ...asks the LLM to edit source files to complete 225 coding exercises".

However, when looking at the actual tests [0], it is not about editing code bases, it's rather just solving simple programming exercies? What am I missing?

[0] https://github.com/Aider-AI/polyglot-benchmark

It seems the general sentiment is that developers are in danger of being replaced entirely. I may be biased, but it seems not to be the most likely outcome in the long term. I can't imagine how such companies will be competitive against developers who replace their boss with an AI.

  function isDivisibleByThree(num) {
    let modulo, mod3 = "012012012012";
    for (const digit of num) {
        [modulo] = mod3.slice(modulo).slice(digit);
    }
    return modulo === "0";
  }

  function isDivisibleByThree(num: string): boolean {
      let mod3 = "012012012012";
      let modulo = "0";
      for (const digit of num) {
          modulo = mod3[Number(digit) + Number(modulo)];
      }
      return modulo === "0";
  }

"The programmer can use whatever representation they see fit with the only restriction being that it could only contain letters, numbers and symbols that could be typed with a single stroke"

"While the base algorithm is very simple, the point of the exercise is that the interviewer will add new rules to test how you update the code while keeping it readable and maintainable."

The solution is clever and demonstrates solid knowledge of TS. However, in my experience getting too clever with the type system is not always a good idea for ordinary application code maintained by a team of average TS developers.

Doesn't that mean they have 5 times more exposure, not 80% more?